THE BIRTH OF JESUS CHRIST
BIBLICAL AND HISTORICAL FACTS THAT REFUTE TRADITION
© Norm Wormesley Dec 13, 1997
E-mail: builder@ansonic.com.au
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

INTRODUCTION
Many people believe Jesus Christ was born on December 25, probably 1997 years ago. This is because orthodox Christianity promulgates that lie. The religious establishment's linking with the business world of religious myths, pageants, manger scenes, carols, santas, trees and baubles makes casualties of the truth and true religion.

We live in a system that runs on lies, propaganda, deceit, the politics of expediency, and half-truths. The reality of the creation may be accepted, but the reality of a Creator God is scoffed at by too many. Myths may be more sophisticated, but they are still misleading to those who value truth. All of us need to more diligently seek for truth, if we value it.

In John 8:31 we read:

The Jews imagined that, as Abraham's descendants, they were already free. However, where sin, error and lies are in control, sin enslaves. Christ's offer is freedom from such bondage, to a life that not only assumes it is pleasing God, but which in fact does please the Father. We all should seek truth, live truth, and not be conformed to the systems of this world (1Jn 2:15-17) which politicise, deceive, condone error and make people slaves. Yet such systems have an almost universal appeal to mankind. God is not real to people; relatives, friends and associates seem to be the only important reality.

To slot into a religious system, which requires outward acceptance of doctrine and loyalty to a hierarchy, is simple. Such systems, political and religious, value the status quo more than truth, and for adherents the pay-off may be recognition or, for many, simply comfort in numbers.

We may have all often lacked deep personal commitment to living by every word of God (Lk 4:4) and confidence in God's personal calling (2Thess 1:11-12), instead hoping to vicariously achieve through a church group what appeals to basic human needs. A group structure has human benefits but it cannot replace the Truth of God, who calls us into a personal Divine relationship which requires zealous commitment to the Will of God and spiritual growth as described in the Scriptures (Rom 12:1). Yet how wonderful this all is in the context of a community of believers (1Pet 2:5,9-10).

MESSIANIC EXPECTATIONS
Some 2000 years ago there was an air of expectancy in the Middle East. Jewish culture, guided by an understanding of messianic interpretations of Scriptures, expected the fulfillment of prophecies regarding a Messiah. The various sects - Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes and the Qumaran group - all had opinions as to the detail and its timing. Throughout Persia, Babylon and Egypt, wherever Israel had been held captive or lived in exile, this knowledge existed.
Alfred Edersheim in his The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah gives references to ancient Jewish and historic sources speaking of an anticipated Messiah (Bk. 2, ch 5). Other ancient sources are The Sibyline Oracles (3.286-294,652-656), 1Enoch (71:14-17), The Testament of Levi and The Testament of Judah (16:1-5 and 24:1-6 respectively), The Psalms of Solomon (18:1-9). The historians Josephus, Tacitus, and Suetonius and the poet Virgil attest to a universal expectation of a redeemer about that time, but apart from a handful of godly people, the vast majority of religiosity missed the occasion of the birth of Jesus the Christ or Messiah.

Included in the group who knew were Mary and Joseph, Elisabeth and Zacharias, the parents of John the Baptist, the shepherds who had been out watching their flocks at the time of the birth, the Magi from Persia, Simeon a just man, and an elderly inspired widow Anna (Luke 2:25,36).

THE COURSE OF ABIJAH
We can check the facts regarding the timing of the birth of both John the Baptist and of Jesus Christ by comparing the information in the book of Luke, Chapter 1, with a little cross-referencing to 1 and 2 Chronicles:

Here we have information regarding the father of John the Baptist, who was part of the Levitical priesthood. From the First book of Chronicles, we can also learn when the course of Abijah served during the biblical year: This shows that there were 24 divisions of the priesthood that served each year. Each division served a week that began on a Sabbath and ended on a Sabbath (1 Chr 9:25; 2 Chr 23:8). John the Baptist's father served in the eighth division for seven days. Each priestly division served five weeks in total, separately twice, and all were together for the three busy weeks of Unleavened Bread, the Feast of Weeks and the Feast of Tabernacles (1 Chr 9:1-26; 2 Chr 23:1-8).

The eighth course of which Zacharias was a part actually served in the tenth week, allowing two extra weeks for both Unleavened Bread and Pentecost. This brings it to the week of the year that begins approximately Sivan 15 and ends Sivan 22, depending on when the Sabbath fell in the lunar month.

Note the reference to Elijah. This will come up again later. This would have been after the third Sabbath of (the third month) Sivan, the earliest possible date being Sivan 15 and the latest Sivan 29, again depending on when the Sabbath fell. This would fix the conception of Jesus after the third Sabbath of (the ninth month) Kislev, the earliest possible date being Kislev 15, the latest Kislev 29.

The twenty-fifth of the month Kislev (which corresponds to our November-December) is the beginning of Hanukkah, the Festival of Lights, a fitting date for the conception of the Messiah, "the Light of the world".

Given a perfect 40-week pregnancy, John the Baptist would have been born at Passover season. Interestingly, the Jewish ritual of Passover involved the setting of a place for Elijah and the opening of the door to welcome him. Jesus Christ, in Matthew 11:15, said John the Baptist was the Elijah who was to come, which was also the message to Zachariah in Luke 1:17.
A 40-week pregnancy for Mary brings the birth of Jesus Christ to the Feast of Tabernacles. This is alluded to in John 1:14:

This also logically explains why it was impossible to find vacant accommodation in Bethlehem, as there was both a government-decreed census being held as well as the Feast of Tabernacles, about 7 miles away in Jerusalem.

IN WHAT YEAR DID ALL THIS OCCUR?
There were many scriptural prophecies. At one time the rabbis applied 456 scriptures to the Messiah and his salvation.
Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy was one of the most extensive, giving us a basis for calculating the year in which to expect the Messiah:

From the time of the decree to restore and build Jerusalem until the coming of the Messiah would be 7 weeks (49 years) plus 62 weeks (434 years), yielding 69 weeks, or 483 years, that is, until the Messiah should be cut off. The 70 weeks (490 years) are thus incomplete by 7 days (7 years). This prophecy created the expectation and speculation within Judaism over about 40 years that the coming of the Messiah was imminent sometime around 15 B.C. to 25 A.D. Calculating from 445 B.C. to A.D. 30 yields 475 years, rather than the 483 years required. However, the ancient calendar was based upon lunar years of 360 days. When the two calendars are adjusted, an extra 7 years will have to be added to the 475, bringing us up to the 69th week, with an extra year between B.C. and AD (475+7+1=483).
There were many variations then, and still are today, which only demonstrates that there were obviously many errors.

One system of counting of time in the Greco-Roman world reckoned the years from the establishment of the city of Rome (753 B.C.). Years were designated a.u.c. (ab urbe condita, Latin for "from the foundation of the city").
In A.D. 525, in Rome, Dionysius Exiguus, a Scythian monk, began developing an alternate method of reckoning time at the request of Bishop John I. Assuming the birth of Christ was December 25, 753 a.u.c. (without any scriptural validity, but based rather on existing pagan practices), Dionysius started his calendar with January 1, 754 a.u.c., and reckoned years anno Domini (Lat: in the year of the Lord ), or A.D. Thus, 754 a.u.c. became A.D. 1 of the Christian era.
However, this is impossible, as subsequent research has determined 750 a.u.c. to be the year of Herod's death (on or before the Passover in 4 B.C.), which could not have occurred before the birth of Jesus. According to Luke 2:1-5, Christ was born about the time of a census ordered sometime between 7 and 4 B.C. by Quirinius, who was twice governor of Syria:

Quirinius was governor of Syria twice: from 7 B.C. to 1 B.C, when this census was taken, then again in A.D. 6-10, when in Judea he supervised another, this time taxing the Jews. This fulfilled the prophecy of Micah 5:2: Both names indicate the fertility of the area, Bethlehem meaning "House of Bread". Note the symbolism when considering the words of Christ: THE CHRISTMAS DAY FABLE
Luke 2:6 So it was, that while they were there, the days were completed for her to be delivered. 7 And she brought forth her firstborn Son, and wrapped Him in swaddling cloths, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. 8 Now there were in the same country shepherds living out in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night.

Shepherds would not normally have been tending their sheep in fields at night in December, due to the cold of winter. The myth of a Christmas Day birth is just that, a pagan myth. For instance, tomorrow night's forecast [mid-December] for Bethlehem, obtained via the Internet, is 3 degrees, not the weather to be sitting out on a hillside looking after sheep!

HEROD AND THE CHILDREN
Mat 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, 2 saying, "Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him." 3 When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. 4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. 5 So they said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: 6 'But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, Are not the least among the rulers of Judah; For out of you shall come a Ruler Who will shepherd My people Israel.'" 7 Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared.

Herod was an extremely cunning ruler:

Herod's inquiry concerning the time of the appearance of the star indicates that the Magi had not seen the star from the time they left their homes in the East. Herod's original inquiry masks his scheme to locate and execute the infant claimant to the throne. Verses 9, 10 suggest that the Magi saw the star again only upon their departure from Jerusalem. It led them unfailingly to Bethlehem. The account would seem to indicate that the star was a supernatural, and not an astronomical phenomenon. The young Child [Gk. Paidion], and not the Babe [Gk. brephos], as in Luke 2:16, had been moved from the manger, indicating that several months, or probably more than a year, had passed before the Magi's visit.
In addition, three is the number of the gifts - gold, frankincense and myrrh - not the number of the Magi.
The gold is generally recognised as being symbolic of Christ's kingship, a gift for a king. It was also symbolic of purity, of refinement and purging.
Frankincense was sprinkled on the Bread of the Presence in the temple. This fragrance was added to the bread to be offered to God, symbolic also of Christ, the Bread from Heaven, the Bread of Life, who was an acceptable offering to the Father for us all.
Myrrh was used in the preparation of brides. This is symbolic of Christ's role in preparing the Church, His Bride, for the wedding Feast. Joseph and Mary and Jesus fled to Egypt prior to the slaughter of children in Bethlehem, which was obviously before the death of Herod Herod, the king mentioned, is Herod the Great, who was born in 74 B.C. and who died between March 29 and April 11, 4 B.C. Politically astute, disliked, a Jew of Idumean (Edomite) descent, his powerful friends, Mark Anthony and Octavius, advised the Roman Senate to give him the title "King of the Jews". He had ten wives and was a ruthless leader with obvious paranoia. In 19 B.C. he began the reconstruction of the Jerusalem temple.
The loathsome physical decay of his latter years was accompanied by mental disorder. In his last ten years, his speech was rambling and violent. In 7 B.C. he had two of his sons strangled publicly. In March 4 B.C. he attempted suicide six days before his own agonising death. With tumors on his feet, extreme difficulty in breathing, with convulsions and stench of breath, his body putrefying and fly-blown, he ordered the death of his plotting son Antipater. Five days later, after overseeing his son's execution, he died.

Since Herod's reign was bloodstained, the murder of these children would not have attracted much attention outside the immediate vicinity. Such an atrocity was not uncommon for Herod, of whom Augustus Caesar said, with a play on words, that it was better to be Herod's sow (Gk. hus) than his son (Gk. huios).

Mary, Joseph and the young Jesus definitely could not have returned to Egypt before March 4 B.C., having fled to Egypt sometime earlier during 5 B.C. to avoid the massacre. It would seem that Jesus was 12 to 18 months old while the family was in Egypt.

Based upon the calculations of the Magi, Herod arbitrarily included all male children under two years of age in order to make sure that the one born King of the Jews (v. 2) would be included. As he had removed all former threats to his reign by the sword, so he tried to do with the Christ. This illustrates the fact that Herod felt that the threat of a rival King, who could have been born as early as 7 B.C. and as late as 5 B.C., existed in 5 B.C.
Together with the fact that Quirinius' governorship of Syria began from 7 B.C., the evidence indicates that the birth of Jesus was probably in 6 B.C. This seems to me to be the best conclusion. The Feast of Tabernacles in 6 B.C. began on Tishri 15, or September 25, 6 B.C.

CONCLUSION
This study for information regarding the birth of Jesus the Christ was not undertaken so that we can celebrate Christ's birthday, but rather so that we can in place our confidence in Scripture to understand the truth and so abandon the fables this world chooses to believe.

Go back to our Home Page