|
EL84/6BQ5 Output Stage |
|
My intention with the output stage of this project amplifier was to use a completely conventional output stage; with my odd and somewhat suspect output transformers to worry about I wanted to be able to eliminate any other output stage variables I could. This wasn't the time to experiment with something wonderous and new in terms of stage topology or valve types! So I had a fair idea that EL84's or something similar would be the go, striking an appropriate balance between the available chassis sockets, B+ and heater supplies available, and physical size, and the power I thought I might drag out of my odd output transformers. |
![]() |
![]() |
EL84 valve data was readily available at Nostalgia and Triode Electronics. The EL84 (a.k.a. 6BQ5) is a relatively common medium power output pentode, with many many application examples. In Class AB1 a push-pull pair is capable of in excess of 10Wrms into an appropriate transformer coupled speaker load. Anode power dissipation is 12W. Design anode voltage maximum is 300V although it is not at all uncommon to see it used well over this rating, to 350V or so is not unusual, and it appears to survive such abuse well enough! These Pdiss and Va ratings suggest a quiescent bias anode-cathode current to around 40mA or so. At a Va of 300V, (the highest for which manufacturer ratings are given, since that's the design max for the valve), an Raa of the appropriate output transformer of 8 kOhms is given, making the primary impedance of the transformer I proposed to use substantially too low. I appreciated that that would result in a lower output power realisable in my amp than would otherwise be possible. I had decided that I would at least try to maximise the albeit low power that at least I could achieve. The speakers I use are poor quality and low efficiency, and the power available from this amp would be low in any event. |
I felt I could not afford the "luxury" of sacrificing more, and looked wistfully but merely passingly at the "triode mode" data also available for the EL84. I would have to pass up the better sonics but lower power of the triode mode connection.
Leak |
I had to search a bit to find an example or two of the output stage I had in mind; EL84 Class AB1 push-pull in ultralinear mode, with cathode (self) bias. Many examples existed for triode mode or pentode mode, and using grid bias. But the web provides such an accessable and immense resource for such a purpose. The output stage of the Leak Stereo 20 and Leak TL12Plus3 at Kiewa were interesting, and included most of the circuit elements and component values (near enough) that I would eventually use. Then I came across website references to the Heathkit UA-1 at several websites; Heath Hi-Fi (or Heath Hi-Fi), SDS Labs (Sheldon Stokes), and "Tom80". The Heathkit SA2 also used much the same circuit, again seen at a number of websites including Heath Hi-Fi (or Heath Hi-Fi), and "Tom80". |
Leak |
Then followed an extremely useful and informative note on the Heathkit UA1from Sheldon Stokes;
The second scheme uses some current feedback as well as voltage feedback. With this second scheme, the current from the speaker is sensed via a small value resistor and fed back into the cathode of the input stage. The voltage feedback from the output of the amp is reduced by about half to keep the total feedback about the same. This may have worked well with old speakers, but doesn't sound very good with my Mission bookshelf speakers. And it sounds just awful with the Quad ESL's. You can flip a switch on the front of the amp to select either the great sounding traditional all voltage feedback, or the bad sounding current/voltage feedback scheme. When I rebuilt these amps, I removed that feature completely from the amp, and used the voltage feedback scheme."
I constructed my derivative version without this second type of current/voltage feedback scheme, and on the strength of Sheldon's adverse comment decided simply to leave it that way, with a conventional feedback scheme only!
"The UA-1 and UA-2 amps are essentially identical. The only differences between the UA-1 and UA-2 are that Heath increased the value of the cathode resistor on the output tubes because they were running them WAY too hot, and burning them out quickly. The UA-1 had a 130 Ohm resistor in the cathode at first. They changed that pretty quickly though, and the schematic here reflects that change. They also reduced the value of the screen grid resistor on the input stage to 680 kOhms. I have tried both the 1 MOhm and 680 kOhm resistor and there is no difference that I can hear or measure."
EL84 |
I then looked at one or two ways of doing the cathode biasing; that shown above was interesting although in the end I didn't use it. Rummaging through my parts collection I discovered four (one for each output valve for the two channels) nifty little 120 Ohm wirewound presets. Bingo! On the strength of this discovery I decided to use discrete (unlinked) bias arrangements for each valve, selecting a series resistor that I hoped would put these pots at about 60 Ohms, the middle of their range, at a nominal cathode current of 35~40mA. With a bit of fiddling the resistor value turned out to be 270 Ohms. I added a 1 Ohm resistor in series for test purposes (the voltage across it in mV is the current through it in mA), to make set-up easy. I found it relatively easy to set the bias of each valve for the same cathode current by these means, although I guess I'll have to recheck the bias setting regularly as the valves change over time. |