ABIB AND THE BIBLICAL CALENDAR
BIBLICAL REASONING PERTINENT TO DETERMINING ABIB
© Norm Womersley
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm
Several months ago I prepared a one-page summary on "the start of the year" in the biblical calendar. Firstly, it was a response to my daughter's request to simplify the issue, and secondly as a study for myself. I have since found the need to provide a more detailed response as to why my statements were made, hopefully as a means of giving greater clarification.
KEYS IN DETERMINING ABIB 1st
--- "THE START OF THE YEAR"
(1 ) The 1st day of each Year
and every lunar month begins at sunset (a Biblical sign), where
within the next 24 hours a new moon (a Biblical sign ) will occur.
This therefore makes 14th-15th a Full Moon.
A lunar month is 29 days 12 hours 44 + minutes. The month Abib,
meaning (sprouting, budding, green ears) is to be the first month
of the Biblical Year (Ex 12: 2; 13:4).
2) This first month begins at the non-specific green ears or budding time (a Biblical sign), when barley is in ear, but wheat and rye are immature in the Northern Hemisphere (Ex 9:31,32).This green ears time is consistently identified astronomically by the Vernal Equinox which is the mid-way Sun position of days lengthening since the winter solstice (a Biblical sign), thus causing the growth of planted crops. The Vernal Equinox marks the separation of winter from summer in the earth's cycle around the sun. Biblically, this is the start of the summer season (Gen 8:22; Ps 74:17; 1Ki 20:26).
(3) The nearest New Moon cannot be more than 15 days before or after the Equinox, as the maximum number of days in a month is 30. This means that with the Equinox falling on the 20th March, (which it currently does), the start of a Biblical New Year cannot be before 5th March or later than 4th April.
(4) There is the need for a thirteenth month to bring the Lunar and Solar cycle calculations, including the equinox, into synchronisation, (called Adar II). It is the month just before the start of the New Year, 1st Abib.
The first of Abib, the beginning of the
year, is the day of the New Moon nearest to the Vernal Equinox.
It can be before or after the Equinox and the timing is
from Jerusalem.
There is no biblical evidence to postpone
the start of the Biblical year by a month so as to force the observance
of Passover after the Equinox. It is a popular misconception,
however.
In studying these Calendar issues so extensively I have come to the conclusion that the Calendar that most consistently and faithfully follows the various scriptural particulars, as well as retaining a practical synchronisation with annual astronomical and agricultural calculations, (also required by Scripture), is the Calendar to observe. Clearly this is accomplished only by a full recognition of the importance of the solar cycle as the seasonal determining phenomena. The lunar cycles divide time into months and the new moons signify the beginning of each month.
There are several opinions as to when a new moon occurs. The first mention of the timing of a new moon in the Bible demonstrates that it was predicted ahead of time, and that crescent sighting was not required.
I have therefore concluded on available evidence, (both Biblical and secular), that for Biblical appointments and seasonal precision it is necessary to have synchronisation between :
1. The seasonal marker, sign or phenomenon that is used to start the year is the early new growing season, recognised by the name given to the first month of the year ABIB and confirmed by Scripture.
a.tequwphah hayah shaneh
Scripturally referred to as, the turn of the year, circuit, or
year's end, depending on translation.
8622. tequwphah, tek-oo-faw'; or tequphah,
tek-oo-faw'; from H5362. a revolution, i.e., (of the sun),
course, (of time); lapse:--circuit, come about, end; (4 times
in Scripture).
Tequwphot Nisan is the secular Jewish term for what we know as the March Equinox, or Northern Hemisphere Spring Equinox.
We know that the equinoxes, vernal and autumnal, divide summer from winter, the two biblical seasons. The solstices mark mid-summer and mid-winter. The decision as to which of the solar markers to choose is apparent. As the seasonal green sprouting and budding harmonise with the March solar equinox, which divides winter from summer, it is then necessary to determine the correct lunar sign, marker, or phenomenon to synchronise all three (Gen 1:14; Ps 104:19).
3.The lunar marker, sign, or phenomenon is quite plainly the New Moon, which marks not only the start of the year but also the beginning of every month.
I should add that this, 'theoretically',
would be the stance of Judaism, except that when taking these
matters into account determination of the 1st Abib is back 177
days from having determined the first day of Tishri. In doing
this the Passover is right according to the astronomical signs
40% of the time. This margin of error occurs because of non-scriptural
postponements based on Pharisaic traditions. There is further
complication by using an inaccurate 19-year time cycle adopted
by Rabbi Hillel 2nd in c.352 A.D. (See Attachment
A which is copied from Jewish sources).
King Jeroboam (c.930-909 B.C.), who broke from the Kingdom of Judah, set up an alternative 'festival calendar'.
BEFORE OR AFTER THE SPRING
EQUINOX?
There are debatable options, as viewed by
some, as to the starting point for Abib:
1. whether to choose the new moon before
the March equinox;
2. the new moon after the March equinox;
3. or the new moon nearest to the March
equinox.
The whole point of this analysis is to understand the biblical criteria and to bring them into accord. I know of no biblical reason or logic to assume that the 1st of ABIB should be anything other than the new moon nearest the equinox, which is the analytical choice, as closeness is crucial to synchronisation.
Judaism has selected the first new moon
, for Abib 1998, as being after the Equinox. However,
in 1999, Judaism will begin Abib before the equinox.
But in the year 2000, as in 1997, because of devised traditions,
the Rabbinic calendar will be a month late in terms of the equinox.
ATTACHMENT
The following article by Dr John Zucker
appeared in the Jewish Chronicle, April 11, 1997.
Dr. Zucker is a research fellow in physics
at King's College, London University.
"WHY PESACH IS NOW FALLING OUT OF SEASON?
Is Pesach this year later than it should be, according to the dictates of the Torah? The straight answer is yes. But if April 22 - on which the first day falls - is considered late, think ahead to the year 2005, when the first day will fall on April 24. Indeed, in some years - 1929, 1948 and 1967, for example - Pesach began on April 25. To understand why it is biblically inappropriate for the festival to fall so late in the year, one has to consider the conditions governing its date. The Torah specifies two criteria. "The festival of matzot," it says in Exodus 34:18, "shall be kept... at the appointed time in the month of Aviv." In Leviticus 22:6, the appointed time is given as the 15th of the month. 'Aviv' means spring, so it is necessary to determine what is meant by the first month of spring. The first month is required on the principle that a mitzvah should be performed as soon as possible.
Although the Jewish festivals are placed in specific lunar months, the 'tekufot', or seasons, are governed by the solar calendar. The lunar month which is designated as Aviv is dependent on a civil date. It is generally accepted that the first day of spring in the northern hemisphere is when the length of the day - which has been increasing steadily since December 21 - equals the length of the night. This occurs on March 21 in a normal civil year, and March 22 in a leap year.
How does one know which lunar month includes the first day of spring? In the Talmud (Sanhedrin 13b), Rabbi Samuel, the son of Rabbi Isaac, states that the first day of spring should occur in the lunar month while the moon is still waxing. The moon grows from new to full in the first 14.5 days of the month. If a Rosh Chodesh (new moon) occurs at any time between the sixth and the 20th March, then on the 21st March the moon will still be waxing and that month is designated as Aviv. If this is not the case, the next lunar month is chosen. The earliest date Pesach can occur is March 21, and the latest it should occur is April 20. Yet an examination of the calendar from 1920 to 2019 shows the earliest date to be March 26. Instead of the festival falling between March 21 and April 20, this century has seen the first day being celebrated between March 26 and April 25.
Future calendars reveal a gradual shift of Pesach - and, consequently, of the other festivals - to progressively later dates. In the century from 2950 to 3050, the first day of Pesach will be found to fall between March 31 and April 30. What is happening? And, more importantly, is it possible to rectify the situation? The origin of this glitch lies in the fixed Jewish calendar that has been in use for the past 1,650 years. The calendar attempts to correlate the solar year - the time the earth takes to go round the sun - with the lunar month, during which the moon circles the earth. The year determines the seasons, while the months - in their appropriate seasons - determine the festivals. The present fixed calendar is based on the premise that 19 solar years are exactly equal to 235 lunar months. Dividing 19 into 235 gives 12, with seven remaining. Thus, in every 19-year cycle, seven years acquire an extra month, which is why we have Jewish leap years every 3rd, 6th, 8th, 11th, 14th, 17th and 19th year cycle.
The 19-year Metonic cycle is named after the Greek astronomer , Meton, who devised it around 430 BCE. It was well known to the rabbis of the Talmud. When, in 350 CE, the Roman authorities limited the authority of the Nasi - the spiritual leader - in Eretz Yisrael, regarding the proclamation of Rosh Chodesh, Hillei 11, the then Nasi, instituted the present fixed calendar, based on the Metonic cycle. Although it was remarkably accurate for its time, it is not exact. The 235 lunar months exceed the 19 solar years by a little more than two hours. Spread over 1,000 years, this totals some 4.5 days. One thousand years ago, the first day of Pesach would have fallen, on average, four or five days earlier than now, in the correct solar time span as dictated by the Torah.
Is it possible to remedy the present situation, and to halt the gradual shift of Pesach? In his book, Rabbinical Mathematics and Astronomy, Dr. W.M. Feldman suggests a new basis for a fixed Jewish calendar. He demonstrates that if, in a cycle of 334 years, 123 of them were leap years, the differential between the Jewish and civil calendar would amount to no more than 39 mins. It would take 12,500 years to accumulate a one-day discrepancy, instead of 230 years it takes under the present system. Feldman proposes constituting the 334-year cycle as a series of 19-year minor cycles, with the odd 11 years forming the beginning of the next major cycle. If Feldman's 334-year cycle had been employed over the past 1,650 years, instead of the present 19 year cycle, there would have been one less leap year.
To make the festivals less movable in the future, and to accord more accurately with the requirements for Pesach to fall in the month of Aviv, one designated leap year would have to lose that status. The next most suitable year for this purpose would seem to be 2005 (5765). By making it a regular year instead of a leap year, Pesah would commence on Saturday, March 26, instead of Sunday, April 24. The year 5765 would be the 89th year of a 334-year cycle, the 13th year of the fifth 19-year cycle within the larger cycle. From this basis, future dates could be computed, demonstrating that Pesach would be confined to its designated Torah place for the foreseeable future. The year 2005 is sufficiently far ahead to enable one to compute, and to adjust to, the new system. Even the most forward-looking parents will not yet have booked their son's barmitzvahs! Dr. John Zucker (Jewish Chronicle. April 11.1997).