God humbled you, allowed you to hunger, and fed you
with manna .... that He might cause you to know that
man is not to live by bread alone,
but man must live by every word
that proceeds from the mouth of the LORD
(Deut 8:3)


A HISTORY
OF
TITHING
FROM
THE BIBLE

by Hubert Krause

and Orest Solyma

For we know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that though He was rich, yet for our sakes
He became poor so that we,
through His poverty, might become rich (2Cor 8:9)

© The Church of God in Williamstown
Web Site:http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm



PREFACE
Any person who hungers and thirsts for the righteousness of Jesus Christ experiences the ongoing miracle of Christianity: deep personal identification with the patriarchs, prophets, apostles and the other godly women and men of the Bible. Such identification produces assurance that one's motivations, speech, and works are growing in a godly direction, yet the struggle to live godly is always a very difficult but enriching experience (Rom 7:14-22). One is guided by the same understanding of the Law as those who died in the Faith (Heb 11). With failures in living as Christ has shown us, which are more than likely daily, one experiences the battle of the flesh against the Spirit and Spirit against the flesh (Gal 5:17; Ps 19:12-14). The repentance that follows is powerfully described by the mighty apostle Paul (Rom 7:22-25).

Eternal life, God's purposes for all humanity, His grace and the Lamb of God as a sacrifice for the sins of the world were foreknown by the Father before time began and before the creation of the universe (Tit 1:2; 2Tim 1:9; 1Pet 1:18-20; Acts 2:23). God defines what is good and what is evil (Gen 2:9,17; 1Jn 3:4). His understanding is infinite and He knows the end from the beginning (Ps 147:5; Isa 46:10; Acts 15:18). The definitions of sin and spiritual life are the same for all those who will be in the first resurrection. They are all members of the one Faith, one Hope, imbibing of the same Spirit (Eph 4:4-5), and this is irrespective of the time and culture in which they have lived, since God does not change (Mal 3:6; Heb 13:8; 1:12).

For example, both Moses and Jeremiah, though in their own cultural times, understood, like Paul, that circumcision is of the heart (Deut 10:16; 30:6; Jer 4:4; 9:25-26). Similarly, David, king of Israel, though he restored the whole Levitical system, understood that God did not want the sacrifice of animals (Ps 51:17; 40:6-8; Isa 1:11-20). This understanding of David and Isaiah is consistent with that of the writer of Hebrews and all the saints (Heb 10:5-10).

The OT Levitical system contains prefiguring sacrifices (lambs, goats, bulls, etc), other symbols (shewbread, incense, ark, etc), and a priesthood that suggested the priesthood of Jesus Christ and of the saints (Ex 19:4-6; 1Pet 2:5,9; Rev 1:6). Whatever the nature of the changes made, as the reader presently perceives, in the light of the NT, there has to be a continuing coherency, as alluded to in the previous paragraph. Most of us may readily agree that the tabernacle and temple prefigured the Church (Acts 15:14-17; Isa 33:20). We might readily agree that the sacrifices, tabernacle and temple prefigured the work of God and the Lamb of God (Rev 19:7; 21:2,3,9,10,22). Yet are our concepts consistent?

To fully show how these things are integrated and beautifully coherent would take at least a lengthy book. This paper therefore cannot claim to be "The History of Tithing from the Bible," because the subject is so vast, being part of many aspects intimately connected with the tabernacle, temple and priesthood service. Our paper offers a careful and biblically consistent presentation about support for those who serve God and His sheep as shepherds with Jesus Christ (cf. Jn 21:15-19; Jer 23:3,4), who provide godly care to the poor (Ps 82:3-4; Matt 5:3; Jas 2:5), and who uphold the Festivals (Isa 56:1-8; Ezk 20:1-32; Col 2:16-17). Answers given here, we believe, agree with the known biblical rationale that shows us the spiritual meaning and practical applications of sacrifices, offerings, circumcision, tabernacle, temple, etc.

Hubert Krause spent months of work on the initial paper which he gave to me for editing and further input. His research and compilation was immense and I thank him. I also thank my wife for her invaluable help.

Orest Solyma (Melbourne; 22 Jan.; 24 June, 1998)


A HISTORY OF TITHING FROM THE BIBLE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Sacrifices and offerings are aspects of the Law of God, which Law is perfect and continues to transform the lives of those who follow the Shepherd (Ps 23:1-2; 51:6-7). That which is perfect does not change and produces ongoing spiritual growth. For example, though the Son of God never sinned, He grew in wisdom, in stature, in favour before God and men because He lived entirely by the Will of God (Lk 2:52; Jn 5:30). Jesus Christ, our Redeemer and Messiah, learned obedience by the things that He suffered and by the trials He experienced, yet He was always sinless (Heb 5:8; Isa 28:16).

He has told us all in Matt 5:17-18:

However, we find that animal sacrifices are abolished, circumcision is not obligatory, and the physical rituals of the Day of Atonement cannot be carried out. How do we reconcile such changes in the Law with Christ's statement in Matt 5:17-18?

Sacrifice, as a principle, is eternal (1Pet 1:18-20; Rom 12:1). Circumcision of the heart, ears, eyes, mouth and whole life has always applied to everyone (Ex 6:12; Deut 10:16; 30:6; Jer 6:10; Acts 7:51; Col 2:11). Jesus is our atonement as the Lamb of God from before the creation of the universe (1Pet 1:18-20).

Because this paper challenges accepted conventions and traditions held by tithes-observant churches, it is worth saying again that the Bible upholds the principles of support for those given the responsibility and the gifts to nurture and teach the disciples in the Way, support for the poor and needy, and support for observance of the Festivals typifying the Plan of Salvation.

The problems seem to be in: (1) making righteous interpretation of Scripture which is contrary to petrified traditions; (2) making godly judgments from Laws based within a theocratic society but now within the present evil world; (3) explaining, in sincerity and Truth, how biblical principles and practices for today's disciples do not contravene the spirit of the Law. The problem of the Law is in spiritual perception, godly perspective, and application according to the Will of God, and not the traditions and imaginations of men (cp. Matt 7:21-23). The Pharisees practised their Law but were of their father, the Devil (Jn 8:44). They kept the Sabbaths but did not know their meaning (cp. Isa 1:12-18; Amos 5:21-24; 8:10; Hos 2:11).

This document shows that generally accepted interpretations of Scripture about tithes are erroneous.

The following exposition shows how the laws of sacrifices, offerings, and tithes are applicable to Christians. The reader is urged to persist in careful reading of this paper and not to let apparent anomalies deter completion of this fairly lengthy study. Please refer to all Scriptures listed. Understandably there is further need to expound the meaning of sacrifices, various offerings, tabernacle and temple typologies and priestly functions. This will be addressed in a later paper.


PART ONE
TITHING BEFORE THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION
The word "tithe" (Heb ma`aser; the tenth [part]; Strong's No. 4643; Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, Item 1711) is not encountered in Scripture until we come to Genesis 14:20. The first offerings (Heb minchah) mentioned are in Genesis 4:3-4: those of Cain and Abel. Both were apparently worshipping the same God, at the same 'sacred' time, and outwardly with the same mind. Abel's sacrifice and offering were accepted. Though Cain came before the same God (so he thought) and understood that 'sacrifice and offering' were required, he determined how that should be done (Col 3:5; Eph 5:5). Cain's self-determination presided over God's Will (Heb 11:4; 1Jn 3:12; Jude 11; Rom 12:1-2; also see Jn 8:37-39; Matt 15:5-9). Worship in spirit and in truth was beyond his comprehension (Jn 4:24).

It becomes progressively clear in the OT that sacrifices, offerings and tithes are integrated parts of the same worship system in Israel. Conclusions made about one aspect must be alike in principle to other components of godly worship. It is the righteousness of God that is required rather than the sacrifices of animals (Ps 40:6-8; Heb 10:5-10; Ps 50:13-15; 51:16,17; Isa 1:11; Jer 6:20; 7:22,23; Amos 5:21-25; Mic 6:6-8). In looking at these Scriptures and in considering their message it is clear that pureness of heart is foremost (Ps 51:10,19). The Pharisees and Sadducees obeyed the Law-as they saw it-but were rejected by Christ, who always does the Will of His Father (Matt 23:23,28,33; Jn 8:44; Matt 7:21; Jn 5:30; 1Cor 15:24,28).

ABRAHAM AND THE TITHE (Gen 14:16-20)
A common belief about what the Bible says is that Abraham, the father of the faithful, paid his tithes to Melchizedek on the basis of some universal law of tithing which was then in force. This law was codified when the nation of Israel was established.

What the Bible does say
Abram, victorious over the armies of the kings, had rescued his nephew Lot and brought back all the goods and captives previously taken by enemies. He was met by Melchizedek, priest of the Most High God, who blessed him and to whom Abram gave "tithes of all" or, as most translations render it, "a tenth of everything."

The Bible does NOT say

Perhaps this biblical example implies that tithing was obligatory? We cannot argue for or against a decision from silence on a matter.

A closer examination
Note that Abram gave Melchizedek "a tenth of everything" he had brought back from battle. Abraham will be in the first resurrection, is therefore a part of the Bride of Christ, and is therefore a Christian (Gal 3:8; Heb 11:10). Abram was "giving" as opposed to "paying" a tenth. Melchizedek did not use any compulsion of law to collect this tenth. By contrast, in Lev 27:30-33; Num 18:24; Deut 14:22-29, the words "give" or "gave" are not used in describing the obligations of the Israelites to tithe in the Law of Moses.

Christians in various churches are urged to follow Abraham's "tithing" example, but the means of this tithe precedent, going to war to save, is precluded from any explanations. This could hardly be called a consistent use of precedence.

Abram was giving a tenth of the spoils of war, as Heb 7:4 says. Some of the possessions he had recaptured belonged to Lot (v 16), but most of them belonged to the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah (v 11). None belonged to Abram, who refused to take anything that belonged to the king of Sodom (vv 21-24). How can it then be stated that Abraham was acting in accordance with a universal tithing law which was later codified? Nowhere else is there any reference to Abraham tithing.

Consider the following two examples.
  1. When Israel "spoiled" the Egyptians, there is no evidence that any tithes were paid on their acquisitions, even if these spoils are to be considered as back wages due to them for their years of slavery (Ex 3:21-22; 11:2-3; 12:35-36). They did later make liberal offerings to the building of the tabernacle.

  2. The Israelites defeated the Midianites in battle and divided the war booty (Num 31:1-12). One five-hundredth was taken from half the total booty given to the men of war and was allotted to the priests. One fiftieth of the other half given to the 'congregation' was allotted to the Levites. There was no set tithe-one tenth-of the booty given. There was no agricultural increase-the fruits of human effort and God's blessings. The Mosaic instructions given by the LORD (v 25) regarding the spoils of war did not include the requirement to tithe, even though the booty included cattle and sheep (Num 31:9, 26-31).
We see then that Abram's action in giving a tenth to Melchizedek was not in accord with any clear law of tithing then written or unwritten. Abram may have been responding, in part, to customs within the religious culture of his day. He did recognize Melchizedek as the high priest of God (Heb 7:1). He retained nothing of the spoils, so nothing was "tithable". They would have been mostly goods and possessions, treasures and valuables, we would assume, along with captive slaves and animals. Abram would have realized (if a tithing law were in force) that since only new crops and animals were subject to the tithe, he was not required to pay.

Nevertheless, we cannot ignore the fact that Abram tithed on the spoils of war. He gave a tenth to Melchizedek, most to those who had been robbed, and some to those who had helped (Gen 14:21-24). Whenever this example is used to induce people to tithe it seems that other problems inherent in this historic event are overlooked. If Melchizedek was the preincarnate Jesus Christ, who were his supporting priests? Who were his subjects in Jerusalem? Does this historic event suggest that the first public preaching of the Gospel was to Jebusites (Gal 3:8)? This is a problematic example to use to induce others to tithe. But this OT event is used as part of the argument to persuade people that it is an important precedent and example of tithing by the "father of the faithful" (Gal 3:7-9; Rom 4:12,16; Isa 51:2). This is a precedent and example of great importance, but is it of tithing?

ABRAHAM AND HIS TIMES
For Abraham, the principle of the tithe was not something new for in his Babylonian cultural environment the practice was common. Cuneiform tablets contain frequent references to tithing in ancient Chaldea and Ugarit in Syria. The great temples of Babylonia were largely supported by the esra, or tithe, which was levied on prince and peasant alike. Tithing in ancient cultures is invariably associated with a sacrificial system and offerings to a god or gods. (See W. von Soden, The Ancient Orient, [Eerdmans: 1994], pp 188-98; A. Leo Oppenheim, Ancient Mesopotamia, [University of Chicago: 1977], pp 183-98; W. Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament, [SCM: 1987], Vol 1, pp 141-77; Harris, Archer, Waltke (editors), Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, [Moody Press: 1980], Item 1711, and 1711c,h; G. Roux, Ancient Iraq, [Penguin: 1983], pp 127-8; 132-3; 161-4; 196-200; 369-70).

The Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Douglas, Hillyer, Bruce, et al (editors), [IVP: 1988]), which is a popular three-volume Bible dictionary, makes this introductory comment: "The custom of tithing did not originate with the Mosaic law (Gn. 14:17-20), nor was it peculiar to the Hebrews. It was practised among other ancient peoples" (TITHES, p 1572). More detailed verification is in the above sources.

Abram, who was familiar with these ancient practices common in Ur, Haran, and amongst the Canaanites, gave, as a freewill offering of thanksgiving, a tenth of the spoils of war; a thank offering of a tithe for the very likely miraculous deliverance of all and for the retrieval of the stolen goods. Perhaps an additional reason for the offering was that it was made to a king-priest, Melchizedek. Nevertheless, it was voluntary. Admittedly, the writer of Hebrews uses Abraham's example to compare it to the tithes the Levites received (Heb 7:5). But more on this later.

WHO WAS MELCHIZEDEK?
The HarperCollins NRSV Study Bible says Melchizedek was a Canaanite priest-king. Footnotes in the Jerusalem Bible (Darton, Longman & Todd: 1966) say that 'several of the Fathers even held the opinion that Melchizedek was a manifestation of the Son of God in person.' The NJB 1985 edition does not include this comment. The Soncino Press Chumash has a footnote saying, The Midrash identifies him with Shem (as do some Targums on the Pentateuch (W.R. Inge & H.L. Goudge, Hebrews, [Cassell: 1924], p 61). The DSS (Dead Sea Scrolls) fragment, 11QMelch, which identifies him as 'the Elohim who takes his place in the divine council in the midst of the elohim (cf. Ps 82:1).' G. Vermes, The Dead Sea Scrolls in English, [Penguin:1990], pp 300-301), has:

Gerhard von Rad in his Genesis commentary, (SCM: 1972), makes these comments (p 179): The commentator goes on to say that this priest-king was a heathen (p 180), but adds: The Jesuit, Leopold Sabourin, in The Psalms: Their Origin and Meaning, (Alba House: 1974), expresses similar views: The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, (New York: 1944), has this interesting comment: The identity of Melchizedek and his significance are controversial. If a claim is made that he is literally without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life (Heb 7:3), that he is the pre-incarnate Jesus Christ, then we have Jesus Christ living and ruling in a Jebusite city in the days of Abraham. The Jebusites were heathen. Who were his helpers in his temple? Would some of them have formed a pre-Levitical priesthood? Such questions seem to be unaddressed when claims are made that Melchizedek was the pre-incarnate Christ directly ruling over a heathen city. Furthermore, such an interpretation overlooks the mother of Jesus Christ in Rev 12:1-5 (see Isa 54:1,5,13; Ezk 16:3,45). A more comprehensive addressing of this subject will be forthcoming in another paper.

JACOB AND THE TITHE (Gen 28:20-22)
A common belief about what the Bible says is that Jacob, like his grandfather Abraham, was committing himself to tithe on his future blessings from God on the basis of a law of tithing then in operation.

What the Bible does say
Jacob made a vow, pledging to God a tenth of all his future blessings if God stood by him.

To whom did Jacob give his tithe? To Melchizedek if he was still in Salem? To Isaac? Did he just burn all his tithes? Jacob's example of offering to tithe is problematic in terms of application today. Insistence on tithing must give intelligent answer to, "To whom does one tithe?" And if one does tithe, then how does one determine who should receive it? Jacob's vow to tithe conditionally was made in Gen 28:20-before Levi, his son, was born. The Book of Jubilees (c. 200 BC), an apocryphal work supposedly revealing Moses' visions during his 40-day stay on Mt Sinai (Ex 24:18), says that Jacob tithed to his son, Levi (Jubilees 32:8-15).

The Bible does NOT say

A closer examination
Jacob promised God a tenth of "all You will give me," but only if (v 20) God would be with him and would bless him. Perhaps he was trying to bargain with God (he still had many hard lessons to learn), but at any rate his preparedness to give his tenth was conditional upon God fulfilling His end of the agreement. Can any individual lay conditions upon a law God has established? The paying of the tithe, as we see in the example of ancient Israel, was not conditional but obligatory. It was God's and holy to Him (Lev 27:30,32). If tithing were a universal law, then Jacob would have been obligated to pay a tenth of his increase to God; he would have had little choice in the matter! Furthermore, Jacob also used the word "give", which, as we have seen, is not used when describing the tithe-payer's obligations. Arguments used to persuade people to tithe on the basis of Jacob's example are not well-founded.

The Talmudic scholar, Rashbam (1085-1174), is cited in the Soncino Chumash as saying that Jacob's tithes were made in the form of sacrifices, presumably burnt offerings. "All" a person's acquisitions, however, were not tithable, according to the law of the tithe later set down for Israel. What was tithable were those items ordained by the law as subject to the tithe, i.e., one's crops and animals. So to assume that Jacob was acting according to the demands of an unwritten tithing law later to be outlined to the Israelites as part of the Old Covenant is not biblically provable. What Israelite ever tithed on all that he was given or acquired? See the later discussion which takes Lk 18:12 into account.

JACOB AND HIS TIMES
The vow to tithe by Abraham's grandson, Jacob, was in accord with common practice among the Semites and other ancient Middle Eastern cultures.

Abraham lived until the boyhood of Jacob, who was probably fifteen years of age when Abraham died. It is therefore quite natural to conclude that Jacob followed the pattern of his grandfather and father in using the concept of the "tenth" as the basis for offerings to God. But how and to whom does one give offerings and tithes according to the will of God? Presumably, if Melchizedek were with us today we would be pleased to tithe to him. But who can be equated to Melchizedek today?

Conclusion
As the reader will have already deduced, Jacob was making a promise to offer in thanksgiving a tenth of all future blessings God would bestow upon him. Offerings based on all acquisitions is reasonable. Such offerings take into account the total of one's perceived and measured blessings (Deut 16:17; 1Cor 16:2; 2Cor 8:12-15). For Jacob, who still had much to learn about faith in God, it was perhaps also a matter of self-preserving expediency. He may have been seeking to make a deal with God by which he would be protected from his brother Esau and could return safely to the land promised him (Gen 33:17-20).


THE TITHE FROM ABRAHAM TO MOSES
A common belief is that an unwritten law of tithing was in continuing force from the earliest times, and that this law was ultimately tabulated and given to Israel as part of the Levitical laws of the First Covenant.

What the Bible does say
Apart from the usage of the word "tithe" in the examples of Abraham and Jacob, there is no other reference to the tithe until the law for ancient Israel is introduced in Leviticus 27:30-34.

Let us consider a few examples where we might logically expect at least some mention of the tithe in the OT.

JOB
There is no reference to tithing when Job's vast wealth is discussed. He is described by God as blameless and righteous, fearing God and shunning evil (1:1,8). Job describes himself as:

How is it that, in reminding God of his good deeds in these areas, Job never once, as part of his defense, mentions any "faithfulness in tithing" on his part? To whom would he have tithed?

JOSEPH (see Gen 41:28-49; also 47:20-26)
As ruler of Egypt, Joseph decreed that the Egyptians who lived on the land he had acquired for Pharaoh pay to the king one-fifth of their crops for the 7-year period of good seasons. If he were aware of a universal tithing law one would assume that, as a principle, one-tenth, rather that one-fifth, of the crops would have been demanded. One might argue that his decisions may have been premised on the principle that one-fifth (a double portion for the firstborn [see Deut 21:17; Ex 4:22; 16:5,22; Job 42:10; Zech 9:12]) was a means of future national redemption of Israel and Egypt from famine.

How significant is it that in the Book of the Covenant (Ex 19:3-24:8), where the commands and statutes of God are set down for the people, there is no mention of tithing even though the festivals of God are noted (23:14-17)? The Israelites were instructed to bring the firstfruits of the land into the House of God (23:18-19). They were told to make burnt offerings, peace offerings, and offerings of sheep and oxen (20:24; 25:4). We see in the whole of the Mosaic text, Gen to Deut, that tithes are a part of a larger OT system of theocratic worship. Notice the amplification with regard to festival gifts and expenditure in Ex 23:17,19a (which is in the context of ratification of the Covenant), in Deut 12:5-7,11-15,17-19,21,26,27; 14:22-29; 16:10,11,13-17. Please notice how these references to offerings and tithes in Deut are consistently to do with the festivals.

Conclusion
It would seem that Abraham, in instructing his descendants, would have informed them about any law of tithing. Yet where is the scriptural evidence for Isaac, Joseph, or any of Jacob's descendants tithing to specific human sources until the Levitical system was set up under Moses? The same argument might be used with respect to the Sabbaths and Festivals. Argument from silence is not proof. However, we may infer the Passover and the resurrection from Abel's sacrifice and from Cain's murder, and from Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac (Gen 22 and Heb 11:17-19). We may infer Sabbath observance by the patriarchs from Gen 2:2-3; Heb 4:4-5; Ps 95:11; et al. It is clear that a separate paper is needed to address this topic.

But to whom would the patriarchs have consistently tithed? How would we understand that Abraham had the whole Gospel if it were not for Paul telling us in Gal 3:8? Would not the patriarchs, along with Job, have left some scriptural evidence that a universal tithing law was in operation during their lifetimes? Our discussion makes it clear that notions of tithing were known. Their application seems markedly different to what so many understand today.

The patriarchs were spiritual leaders in their own right, so to whom would these patriarchs have regularly tithed? There is abundant evidence for offerings and sacrifices. However, regular tithing cannot be adequately accounted for. Patriarchal sacrifices, offerings, and voluntary tithes are expressions of the heart and are personal expressions of Divine blessings. It is clear that the patriarchs expressed gratitude, generosity and worship, and associated these with the concept of firstfruits, firstlings and offerings (Abel: Gen 4:4,5; Noah: 8:20; Abraham: 12:7,8; 13:3,4,18; 22:2ff). Gen 22:9 and Heb 11:10,17-19 show us that Abraham anticipated the death and resurrection of the Son of God. Christ is the Firstfruits of God, and God's means of redemption (1Cor 15:20,23; Col 1:15; Heb 12:23; Jas 1:18; Rev 1:5; 14:4). We know Abraham observed circumcision (Gen 17:23-27; 21:4), but circumcision is not obligatory in the NT (Acts 15:5,24; Rom 2:26-29; Gal 3:3).

The Levitical system, which received the burnt offerings, sacrifices, tithes, heave offerings, vow and freewill offerings, and firstlings of the people (Deut 12:6), had not yet been set up.

The Melchizedek priesthood-even if it could have received the tithes of the Hebrews (Gen 14:13), and there is no evidence that it regularly did-presumably ended in Jerusalem at some point of time. It was located only in Salem (Jebus). And who were all the people associated with Melchizedek? Who were the support staff, and what nationality were the citizens of Salem (Jebusites)? Who were the recipients of Melchizedek's teaching and for how long? Who built and destroyed the temple in which he was the high priest? The Bible doesn't say, but we might assume that they were not descendants of Abraham. Biblical history says that the earlier citizens of Salem were Jebusites (Gen 10:16; 15:21; Josh 15:8,63; Jgs 1:21; Ezk 16:1-3). It is therefore somewhat presumptuous to use such a problematic example to endorse regular tithing in our present environment.

Who should receive our offerings, our vow offerings, our thank offerings, our peace offerings, our freewill offerings, the gifts of our increases? Those who say we should give it to them because they claim to preach a gospel?

By what authority and by what criteria do we decide what to give, how much to give, how often, and to whom?



PART TWO
THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION
The Book of the Covenant (Ex 19:3-24:8), the basic teaching of the First Covenant, and the constitution which governed ancient Israel, was ratified in blood (Ex 24:6-8). It made no mention of tithing. True, offerings, various sacrifices and tithes were part and parcel of the one system, and the Book of the Covenant asks for sacrifices and offerings (Ex 20:24; 24:5). The new national existence of Israel in the land of Canaan was at first financed by freewill offerings, e.g., in the building of the tabernacle (Ex 35:21-29; 36:3,7). Tithes are not mentioned in Exodus. Leviticus 26 (cp. Deut 28), the chapter promising blessings for obedience and cursings for disobedience, does not mention tithing, but does mention idolatry, which many churches might find remotely applicable to them (Lev 26:1,30). The Mosaic law is first found in Lev 27:30-34 after the establishment of the tabernacle. This was the original tithing law which was modified later, as Judaic scholars say.

The Book of Leviticus uses the words offer(ing)(s) more than 400 times. Chapter 1 speaks of the burnt offering; ch 2 of the grain offering; ch 3 of the peace offering; ch 4 the sin offering; ch 5 the trespass offering. Then ch 12 outlines purification rites and offerings for the birth of males and females; ch 16 covers the 15 sacrifices for the Day of Atonement; ch 23 speaks of the Festivals and their sacrifices; ch 25 gives regulations about the sabbatical year, the Jubilee, redemption of property, loans to the poor, and slavery. The last chapter, ch 27, gives rules for the redemption of consecrated people and property, and ends with the first biblical statement about the law of tithing. What are the various applications for today from all these chapters?

THE LAW OF TITHES: LEV 27:30-34

TABLE 1: CAREFULLY COMPARE THESE FIRST STATEMENTS
THE FIRST LAW STATEMENT ON TITHES TO THE LORD
Lev 27:30-34 All the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or of the fruit of the tree, is the LORD's. It is holy to the LORD.
31 If a man wants to redeem any of his tithes, he shall add one-fifth to it.
32 And concerning the tithe of the herd or the flock, of whatever passes under the rod, the tenth one shall be holy to the LORD.
33 He shall not inquire whether it is good or bad, nor shall he exchange it; and if he exchanges it at all, then both it and the one exchanged for it shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed.
34 These are the commandments which the LORD commanded Moses for the children of Israel on Mount Sinai (Gal 4:25-26).
THE OFFERINGS AND TITHES TO THE LEVITES
Num 18:21-32 I give to the Levites all the tithes in Israel as their inheritance in return for the work they do while serving at the Tent of Meeting.
22 From now on the Israelites must not go near the Tent of Meeting, or they will bear the consequences of their sin and will die.
23 It is the Levites who are to do the work at the Tent of Meeting and bear the responsibility for offenses against it. This is a lasting ordinance for the generations to come. They will receive no inheritance among the Israelites.
24 Instead, I give to the Levites as their inheritance the tithes that the Israelites present as an offering to the LORD. That is why I said concerning them: 'They will have no inheritance among the Israelites.'
Tithes from Levites to Priests
25 The LORD said to Moses,

Num 18:26-32 Speak to the Levites and say to them: 'When you receive from the Israelites the tithe I give you as your inheritance, you must present a tenth of that tithe as the Lord's offering. 27 Your offering will be reckoned to you as grain from the threshing floor or juice from the winepress. 28 In this way you also will present an offering to the LORD from all the tithes you receive from the Israelites. From these tithes you must give the Lord's portion to Aaron the priest. 29 You must present as the Lord's portion the best and holiest part of everything given to you.' 30 Say to the Levites: 'When you present the best part, it will be reckoned to you as the product of the threshing floor or the winepress. 31 You and your households may eat the rest of it anywhere, for it is your wages for your work at the Tent of Meeting. 32 By presenting the best part of it you will not be guilty in this matter; then you will not defile the holy offerings of the Israelites, and you will not die.'

What the Bible does say (Lev 27:30-34)

  1. The crops or fruits (v 30), and the animals (v 32) of those who owned them, were subject to the tithe.
  2. There was an extra one-fifth premium for the redemption of the tithes of the crops or fruits, i.e., for a person who wanted to keep the tithe for personal use. The value of his tithe was estimated in monetary terms and this then increased by 20%. The total value in money could then be substituted for the tithe. How would this principle apply today?
  3. Only the tenth animal (the last one, not the first!) that passed under the rod was God's (v 32). It was not a matter of "God getting His money first".
What the Bible does NOT say

Leviticus does not say how the tithe was to be spent or to whom it was to be given. Those matters are addressed later. We are told that the tithe was "holy to the Lord" (v 30). The rabbinic masters Rashi (1040-1105), Rashbam (1085-1174), and the tractate Ma`aseroth (The Tithes) say that this is the "second tithe", as do other Judaic traditionalists and some Christian scholars (e.g., R.J. Rushdoony, The Institutes of Biblical Law, [The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co.: 1984], pp 52-54).

  1. that the productive increase of every Israelite was subject to the tithe. Agricultural production (v 30) and animals (v 32) were tithable, and then only by those who owned them.
  2. that the tithes were to be paid in money. Instead, they were paid in kind, except in cases where the tithe of the crops was redeemed.
  3. that there were two or even three tithes. Only a single tithe is mentioned. Additional tithes are based on rabbinic traditions.
As we progress through this amazing subject we shall see more clearly what is meant by Prov 3:9: Honour the LORD with your possessions, and with the firstfruits of all your increase!

Here are examples of Judaic traditions:
"The cohanim [priests] and L'vi'im [Levites] were debarred from owning hereditary land but were to be given a tithe (tenth) of all produce (Leviticus 27:30-33, Numbers 18:21); a second tithe was to be consumed by the owner in Jerusalem (Deuteronomy 14:22-27); and a tithe for the poor replaced the second tithe in the third and sixth year of the seven-year cycle that culminated in the year of sh'mittah [i.e., the 7th year], in which the land was allowed to lie fallow." [The rabbinic elaboration of the law of tithes is found in the Talmud, which includes the Gemara: interpretations of the Bible compiled by Rabbi Judah the Patriarch c.200 AD; and with numerous additions to make up the Jerusalem Talmud, c.400AD, then the larger and more authoritative Babylonian Talmud, completed c.500 AD]. "The rabbinic elaboration of the law of tithes is found in the Talmud tractates Ma`aserot [The Tithes] and Ma`aser Sheni [The Second Tithe]" (D. Stern, Jewish New Testament Commentary, [JNTP: 1992], p 71).

The reader should note that rabbinic authorities, commenting about the same things, may make quite different comments. And notice, with respect to Lev 27:30ff, what Rashi and Rashbam said (that Lev 27:30-34 refers to the second tithe) and what Stern, a Messianic Jew, cites (that Lev 27:30-34 is for the Levites). We'll see more examples of the disparate and argumentative nature of rabbinic commentary. Similarly, among Christian scholars one finds widely variant interpretations about key issues, especially christology (e.g., R. Bultmann, C. Colpe, O. Cullmann, J.D.G. Dunn, L.W. Hurtado, E. Lohse, D.S. Russell, J.S. Spong, G. von Rad, A.N. Whitehead, Irenaeus, Augustine, Luther, Wesley, et al).

Phillip Cohen in his Introduction to the Talmudic tractate Ma`aseroth summarizes chapter 4 as: "The stages at which produce becomes liable to tithe, when pickled, stewed or salted." And chapter 5: "Describes the operation of the law of tithe, when the farmer transplants vegetables from one part of his domain to another" (page v). Rabbi M.H. Segal in the Introduction to Ma`aser Sheni says: "Jewish tradition distinguished between the secular Levitical tithe, or the First Tithe, which was an annual tax on the produce of the land, and the holy, or Second Tithe, which, according to Deut. XIV,23, was to be consumed before the Lord in the place which He would choose, viz., in Jerusalem" (page v of The Hebrew-English Edition of the Babylonian Talmud, Seder Zera`im, [Traditional Press, New York: 1982].

How interesting that those who say that Jewish tradition retains the oracles of God (Gk logia only in Acts 7:38; Rom 3:2; Heb 5:12; 1Pet 4:11) adhere to selective parts of the Jewish oracles, hoping listeners won't query the inconsistencies, hoping not to get intelligent questions asked by the sheep, and hoping that invented traditions for maximization of income from church members' tithes and offerings will fall on compliant ears.

"The end of the chapter [i.e., Lev 27:26,27,30-33] deals with obligatory dues. These brief passages are largely in conflict with other passages of the Torah and present baffling problems to the student" (W. Gunther Plaut, THE TORAH: A Modern Commentary, [Union of American Hebrew Congregations, New York: 1981], p 966). The same author says of vv 26-27 regarding firstlings that "they may be a fragment of a different law about firstlings, which eventually did not prevail" (p 968); (cp. Ex 13:12-13).

Some Preliminary Conclusions
It is difficult to be certain that Israel tithed in the wilderness. Since tithing is part of the sacrificial system, it should not be overlooked that Israel left Egypt to sacrifice in the wilderness (Ex 3:18; 5:3,8,17). It is probable that some tithing took place in the desert where it wasn't really possible to apply the system in the full manner the Law of Moses prescribed before Israel entered the Promised Land. They tithed on their flocks (Ex 34:3; Num 31:9,30; 32:26). The system, therefore, was not fully in practice until the Israelites entered and settled the land of Canaan under Joshua (Deut 12:1-7,10-14; 14:22-28; 26:1-19). Please notice that the offerings and tithes in these Deuteronomy references were taken personally "to the place the LORD had chosen." Decision on the place that God has chosen to place His Name is crucial. Who has right to the Name of the LORD? See the paper, In the Name of God.

It is an act of "faith" to claim that the "law of tithing" has been continually in force since Adam. The law of sacrifice, the law of selfless sacrifice and whole-hearted devotion to God, on the other hand, is eternal. 1Peter 1:18-20 tells us that the Lamb of God was foreordained before the universe's creation (Heb 1:1-3). The concept of sacrifice and offering preceding creation was observed in Eden and immediately following (Gen 3:21; 4:3).

VARIETIES OF GIVING
How instructional it is to note the place of tithes in the whole concept of giving:

Other kinds of offerings include: (8) all choice offerings which are vowed (minchah; Lev 23:16); (9) peace offerings (shelamim; Lev 3:1ff); (10) drink offerings (nesek; Gen 35:14; Num 28:7-10; Phil 2:17; 2Tim 4:6); (11) wave offerings (tenupah; Lev 23:11-17); (12) sin offerings for unintentional sins (chattat; Ex 29:14; Lev 4:3); (13) sin, trespass offerings (asham; Num 5:6-7; Lev 5:5-13); (14) [special] offerings (qorban; Num 7:12ff). And this listing is incomplete. There are also thank offerings, redemption of firstborn, .... these are all parts of the same system.

Explanation of and requirements in one category, viz., tithes, should surely apply, in principle, to all categories.

Do we express our worship, our joy, our gratitude to the Almighty God for His awesome power, love, blessings, promises, healings, interventions in such varied ways? Should we not?

The argument may be used that Christ's sacrifice abolished the entire sacrificial system. Indeed, Christ's free-will sacrifice did abolish the sacrificial system. King David, who restored the system, knew this (Ps 51:16; also see 1Sam 15:22; Mic 6:6-8). What did David, Samuel, Micah understand that we should likewise understand? Today the Church of the Firstborn (Heb 12:22-23) is the Temple and all the brethren are the priesthood (1Pet 2:9; Rev 1:6; 5:10).

Christ's sacrifice also abolished the tabernacle, temple, and Levitical priesthood. Tithes and offerings were institutionalized into the national theocracy to provide for the Levites, the priests, and associated functions: maintenance of the temple, Jerusalem festivals, and the means of teaching people.

NEW TESTAMENT SACRIFICES
It is interesting and very instructive to note how the NT views sacrifices. In reading these Scriptures one will be struck with the consistency between these verses and the conclusions made in this paper.
Rom 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice (alluding to the burnt offering of a killed sacrifice?), holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable (Gk logikos: rational, genuine, true) service.
2Cor 2:15 For we are to God the fragrance of Christ (alluding to the anointing oil?; Ex 30:22-30; Song 4:11; Ps 45:8) among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing.
Eph 5:2 Walk in love, as Christ also has loved us and given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling aroma (Lev 1:5-9; 2:1-2; 3:1,5).
Phil 2:17 Yes, and if I am being poured out as a drink offering on the sacrifice and service of your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all (Num 28:6-8).
Phil 4:18 Indeed I have all and abound. I am full, having received from Epaphroditus the things sent from you, a sweet-smelling aroma, an acceptable sacrifice, well pleasing to God.
2Tim 4:6 For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand.
Heb 13:16 But to do good and to share forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased.
1Pet 2:5 You also, as living stones, are built up into a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices (which the Levitical priesthood did typologically in the tabernacle and temple worship requirements; cp. Ex 19:4-6; 1Pet 2:9), acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

It is clear that the NT gives profound spiritual significance to sacrifices. This is to be expected, since the sacrificial concept pre-dates the creation (1Pet 1:18-20). The Law of sacrifices is not abolished (Matt 5:17,18), but is spiritually understood, as reflected in the above verses. How are tithes to be understood and applied since they are a part of the same system?

Let us continue with additional preliminary conclusions:

THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: NUM 18:21-32 (See Table 1)
We shall further consider how Judaic scholarship interprets the tithes in Lev, Num, Deut. The reader will find this perplexing and entertaining. Please note that the Jews have (all?) the oracles of God (Rom 3:1-2).

The JPS Torah Commentary: NUMBERS, (JPS: 1990), with commentary by Jacob Milgrom.

What Milgrom is saying is that since the cultural (pagan) background to tithing included everything, and that the Bible is specific and aware of that background, then only those specifics mentioned in the Bible are tithable in Israel.

Jacob Milgrom also says:

Centralized government, which God disapproves of in the human sphere, is addressed in 1Sam 8:4-22. It should be noted that under central control, tithes would be taken-by coercion-from the people by the central authority's agents (1Sam 8:14,15,17). The context makes it clear that this is not according to God's Will and original intent, but God let Israel have what it wanted-identification with the ways of the Gentiles (1Sam 8:5-7; 10:19; Deut 17:14; Lk 22:25).Milgrom admits that he does not see consistency of teaching about tithing in the OT Scriptures. This is because his interpretation is prejudiced by his Judaic traditions. God is consistent in teaching. It is interpretation, based on ideological position not in Scripture, that makes God's word appear inconsistent.

Chapter 6 of Numbers describes the Nazirite vow; ch 7 the leaders' offerings; ch 8 the cleansing of the Levites; ch 15 the grain and drink offerings, unintentional sin, presumptuous sin, Sabbath violation, tassels on garments; ch 18 gives duties of priests and Levites, offerings for the support of the priests (vv 8-20), and tithes for the Levites and priests (vv 21-32). These are all part of the same religious package. Isn't it somewhat puzzling that so few of us know what all these things mean yet we are supposed to live by every word of God (Deut 8:3; Matt 4:4; 5:17-20; Lk 4:4)? But centralized control asserts "send us your tithes" (see Lk 22:25).

This law of tithing, first stated in Lev 27:30, uses the wording, the tithe of the land, i.e., the Promised Land (Gen 12:7; 13:15-18; 15:18; 17:8; Josh 1:6; Hag 2:4; Mal 3:6-12). Leviticus 27, which proclaims the law of the tithe, as well as chapters 25 and 26, contain instructions that were to apply to the Israelites when they came into the Promised Land. It should be realized that tithing, a part of the sacrificial and other Levitical laws, applies to the land God had given them. Changes in the system must be interpreted and applied equitably, justly, righteously, consistently.

It is generally assumed that animal sacrifices, circumcision, and the Levitical priesthood, etc. are abolished, but some part of "the financial system" that helped sustain and keep it all in place is intact-and according to rabbinic traditions-which Christians must uphold in "faith" (cp. Matt 23:4,14,16-20,23,25; 15:3-6).

What the Bible does say (re: Num 18:21-32; see Table 1)

  1. The tithes (i.e., tithing on grain, fruits, oil, wine, livestock) are given "in return for the service that they perform in the tent of meeting" (Num 18:21; Neh 10:32-39; and Heb 7:5-10, which shows that Melchizedek foreshadows Jesus Christ, the High Priest of GOD [Heb 9:11]).
  2. God gave to the Levites, as their portion, "the tithe of the Israelites, which they set apart as an offering to the Lord" (Num 18:24), i.e., the tithes are voluntary. What are offerings and tithes if they are given under coercion and from a reluctant heart (cp. Isa 1:11-17; Amos 5:21-25; 8:10,11)?
  3. While serving at the sanctuary, they were in turn to set apart a tithe of what they received from the Israelites as an offering to be given to the priests (vv 26-32). This was a "tithe of the tithe." How is this applied by tithe-oriented churches? Should the people give their offerings to the local ministry, and then the local ministry tithes to 'headquarters'? At this point you may be laughing for self-evident reasons.
  4. The Bible reaffirms that, although the Levites could consume their portion of the Israelites' tithes at any place, these tithes were nonetheless their payment for their service in the tabernacle (v 31).
The Bible does NOT say
  1. that all of the Israelites' tithes went solely to the Levites;
  2. that this tithe was ever in the form of money;
  3. that there was ever more than one tithe, or tenth.
Let's now look at more rabbinic thought on these matters. The Torah: A Modern Commentary says of all the produce of the land, or all fruits of the trees (Num 18:13; Deut 26:2-11): "But the actual practice was to offer only "from the seven kinds," the fruit for which the land was famous: wheat, barley, wine, figs, pomegranates, olive oil, dates (including date honey)" (p 1138). However, Deut 8:7-8 lists wheat, barley, vines (grapes and wine), figs, pomegranates, olive oil, honey. Why do religious authorities make little additions and omissions (Deut 4:2; 5:32; 12:32; Josh 1:7; Prov 30:6; Rev 21:18-19)?

THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: DEUT 12:5-28
Deuteronomy (from the LXX, meaning "repetition of the law") was written by Moses probably in the last month of his 120 years (1:3). This work expresses Moses' grandest words and inspiration. Before matters of offerings and tithes are addressed, the perspective on wealth and material blessings is addressed.

Just as abundant material well-being can destroy the hunger and thirst for righteousness, so can spiritual starvation produce an unrecognized malnutrition that finally causes a shattered spirit, and who can heal that (Isa 61:1-3)?

The next reference is found in Deut 12. Forty years of exodus have passed, and Israel is about to enter the land of Canaan. P.C. Craigie in his commentary, The Book of Deuteronomy, (Eerdmans, NICOT: 1976), says: "This twelfth chapter is at the heart of much of the current debate in the study of Deuteronomy" (p 216). This comment is with respect to the controversy about modern applications and arguments about the number of tithes (see also 14:22-29; 15:19-23; 16:1-17; 23:21-25; and chapter 26).

What the Bible does say (re: Deut 12:5-28; see Table 2)

Please notice that generous giving and celebration are at the place the LORD chooses.

The Aramaic Bible: The Targum Onqelos to Deuteronomy translates 12:11 as: The translation into English is by B. Grossfeld, (Vol 9, [T & T Clark: 1988], p 46. The Bible does NOT say
  1. that the tithe was in the form of money. Like the other votive gifts of the Israelites (vv 11,17), the tithe was in kind.
  2. that there was more than one tithe, or tenth-and, especially, that this "tithe," of which the Israelites ate with their families at God's feasts, was a separate or additional tithe to the tithe mentioned in Num 18:21-32, in which the Levites at the sanctuary shared. Some commentaries maintain that it is difficult to envisage the Israelites spending the whole of the yearly tithe upon themselves; indeed, they did not, for the Levites were entitled to a share for their support in the work they did for the people of God.
THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: Deut 14:22-29

TABLE 2: Compare the Scriptures

Deut 12:5-28 You shall seek the place where the LORD your God chooses, out of all your tribes, to put His Name for His dwelling place; and there you shall go. 6 There you shall take your burnt offerings, your sacrifices, your tithes, the heave offerings of your hand, your vowed offerings, your freewill offerings, and the firstborn of your herds and flocks. 7 There you shall eat before the LORD your God. You shall rejoice in all to which you have put your hand, you and your house-holds, in which the LORD your God has blessed you. 8 You shall not at all do as we are doing here today; every man doing whatever is right in his own eyes; 9 for as yet you have not come to the rest and the inheritance which the LORD your God is giving you.
10 When you cross the Jordan and dwell in the land which the LORD your God is giving you to inherit, and He gives you rest from all your enemies round about, so that you dwell in safety, 11 then there will be the place where the LORD your God chooses to make His Name abide. There you shall bring all that I command you: your burnt offerings, your sacrifices, your tithes, the heave offerings of your hand, and all your choice offerings which you vow to the LORD. 12 You shall rejoice before the LORD your God, you and your sons, your daughters, your male and female servants, and the Levite who is within your gates, since he has no portion nor inheritance with you. 13 Take heed to yourself that you do not offer your burnt offerings in every place that you see; 14 but in the place which the LORD chooses, in one of your tribes, there you shall offer your burnt offerings, and there you shall do all that I command you. 15 However, you may slaughter and eat meat within all your gates, whatever your heart desires, according to the blessing of the LORD your God which He has given you; the unclean and the clean may eat of it, of the gazelle and the deer alike. 16 Only you shall not eat the blood; you shall pour it on the earth like water.
Deut 14:1-2,22-29 You are the children of the LORD your God; you shall not cut yourselves nor shave the front of your head for the dead. 2 For you are a holy people to the LORD your God, and the LORD has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.

22 You shall truly tithe all the increase of your grain that the field produces year by year.
23 And you shall eat before the LORD your God, in the place where He chooses to make His Name abide, the tithe of your grain and your new wine and your oil, of the firstborn of your herds and your flocks, that you may learn to fear the LORD your God always.

24 But if the journey is too long for you, so that you are not able to carry the tithe, or if the place where the LORD your God chooses to put His Name is too far from you, when the LORD your God has blessed you,
25 then you shall exchange it for money, take the money in your hand, and go to the place which the LORD your God chooses.
26 And you shall spend that money for whatever your heart desires: for oxen or sheep, for wine or similar drink, for whatever your heart desires; you shall eat there before the LORD your God, and you shall rejoice, you and your household.
27 You shall not forsake the Levite who is within your gates, for he has no part nor inheritance with you.
28 At the end of every third year you shall bring out the tithe of your produce of that year and store it up within your gates.
29 And the Levite, because he has no portion nor inheritance with you, and the stranger and the fatherless and the widow who are within your gates, may come and eat and be satisfied, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hand which you do.

Deut 16:11-17 You shall rejoice before the LORD your God, you and your son and your daughter, your male servant and your female servant, the Levite who is within your gates, the stranger and the fatherless and the widow who are among you, at the place where the LORD your God chooses to make His Name abide.
12 And you shall remember that you were a slave in Egypt, and you shall be careful to observe these statutes.
13 You shall observe the Feast of Tabernacles seven days, when you have gathered from your threshing floor and from your winepress.
14 And you shall rejoice in your feast, you and your son and your daughter, your male servant and your female servant and the Levite,
the stranger and the fatherless and the widow, who are within your gates.
15 Seven days you shall keep a sacred feast to the LORD your God in the place which the LORD chooses, because the LORD your God will bless you in all your produce and in all the work of your hands, so that you surely rejoice.
16 Three times a year all your males shall appear before the LORD your God in the place which He chooses: at the Feast of Unleavened Bread, at the Feast of Weeks, and at the Feast of Tabernacles; and they shall not appear before the LORD empty-handed.
17 Every man shall give as he is able, according to the blessing of the LORD your God which He has given you.

TABLE 2: continued

What the Bible does say (Deut 14:22-29)
  1. The tithe of each year's crops and animals was to be brought to God's sanctuary and consumed by the Israelites and their families in the observance of God's festivals.
  2. The tithe could now be converted into money without the one-fifth redemption penalty that had applied in the wilderness. In the land of Canaan, this penalty would be removed, although the proviso if the distance is too great, i.e., there were transport difficulties, remained. Some of the Israelites would have travelled a great distance to the sanctuary, first at Shiloh and finally in Jerusalem.
  3. Each third year (v 28), (i.e., the 3rd and 6th years of the 7-year cycles within the 50-year Jubilee cycles), that year's tithes were to be kept in the Israelite's own home area, and not brought to the central sanctuary. The priests and poor were invited into the homes of those obedient to this law.
The Soncino commentary has this to say regarding v 27: "In addition to the second tithe, the first tithe must be given to the Levites" (Rashi d. 1105; Abraham ibn Ezra d. 1167; p 1068). And regarding v 28: "According to tradition, this refers to the tithe for the poor, i.e., three years shall form a cycle for tithes: the first tithe for the Levites and the second tithe in the first and second years, and the first tithe and, instead of the second tithe, the tithe for the poor in the third year" (ibid.; attributed to Nachmanides d. 1270, and ibn Ezra ). So Judaic tradition says that the third tithe, paid in the 3rd and 6th years of the 7-year cycles, replaces the second tithe. What about funds for Feasts in the third and sixth years?

The Bible does NOT say

  1. that this tithe was in the form of money. It was in produce, of which the Israelites, the families, the poor and the Levites could eat.
  2. that this tithe mentioned in vv 22,28 is a separate or additional tithe. Note that v 28 talks about bringing out "the tithe of your produce for that year," i.e., it is the same tithe, not an additional one. The additional tithe is a surmise based on Judaic tradition.
The Soncino commentary (p 1067) says of v 23: "This refers to the second tithe, because the first tithe was to be given to the Levites who were allowed to eat it anywhere (cf. Num. xviii.26,31)." This conclusion is attributed, by the commentary, to Rashi and the Cabbalist Nachmanides.

At this juncture let us look at a reputed modern commentary with the aim of some summation, further direction, and further proof that commonly-held positions in tithe-keeping Christian churches are without strong and provable support for their dogmas.

Jeffrey H. Tigay in THE JPS TORAH COMMENTARY, (JPS, Philadelphia, Jerusalem: 1996), says in introduction to Deut 14:22-29:

Comment: Amos 4:4-5 speaks derisively of those who observe the three-year sequence of tithes, with festival sacrifices and offerings, but whose worship is full of the leaven of hypocrisy (Amos 4: 1,6-11; 5:21; 8:10-11). These prophetic verses seem to indicate that most, if not all, festival observers are personally assured that idolatry and alienation from the true God could not be applicable (1Cor 10:12). Further comments from Jeffery Tigay regarding Deut 14 are: Has the reader with ears to hear noted the things that are inconsistent with current personal belief and practice? What then should happen? Can you verify your position from Scripture?

THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: DEUT 15:19-23
Deut 15:1-18 contains provisions that are part of the Law's intent to alleviate the sufferings of the poor, viz., inability to repay debts, inability to obtain loans, and enslavement (e.g., loss of flexibility and capacity to earn more by perhaps changing location).

It is horrifying to me that none of the corporate churches I had, to my shame, been associated with in the past 34 years, have produced anything remotely like the present Pope's encyclicals attempting to deal with the issues in Deut 15:1-18 (see Laborum Exercens [On Human Work], (1981), and Rerum Novarum ["Social Teaching"], (1991). Despite the good words expressed in the encyclicals, the corporate power behind those words is almost void. Since these documents have been released, poverty and the plight of vast numbers of people around the world have continued to deteriorate. The free market global economy is driven by heartless and immoral jungle-warfare competitiveness and is dressed as a sensuous and seductive city whore (Rev 17:1-2). It rampages across the world as the precursor to the Babylon of the Apocalypse, and is directed by bodies such as the IMF, World Bank, and UNO which carry out the wishes of that arch-exponent of materialism, the USA. Though more wealth is being created for the relatively few, there is also increasing oppressive poverty, acceleration in impoverishment of third world nations and powerless class sectors within Western nations so that debt-ridden Western nations can maintain ecologically unsustainable greed. My deepening anger is also fed by the fact that all corporate churches I know of and who constantly call for the member's tithes to preach their Gospel spend far more on their own lifestyles than on personal devotion to the purity of the Word of God, to feeding the flock, edifying the sheep and strengthening those called, chosen, and faithful. Is it better to war about man-made ideas rather than to hunger and thirst after righteousness (Jas 4:1-4; Ezk 34:1-24)?

Deut 15:19-23 deals with eating the male firstlings of herds and flocks, year by year, at the place the LORD chooses. The animals, if blemished, cannot be sacrificed. Jewish tradition says that this law was for the Levites' benefit only (Chumash, [Soncino Press: 1981], p 1072).

Festival-observant groups like to expound some verses in Deut 16:12-17 (see Table 2) to encourage the giving of offerings, but neglect other verses, e.g., Deut 12:6-12.

Let's consider:

This expression of Levitical dependence on those who believe reminds me of the sending out of the 12 in Lk 9:1-6,10; and the 70 in Lk 10:1-17. They (all disciples of Jesus Christ) had to step out in faith and depend entirely on those who heard them for their material support. In this scenario Levites do not have choices as 'shepherds' do who receive money (2Cor 11:7-15), but eat the God-approved food (Lev 11) they are given (cp. 1Tim 4:4,5; 1Cor 12:27,28).

The last pentateuchal reference to the Levitical tithe that we shall examine is in Deut 26:12-15:

What the Bible does say
The tithe of the land in the third year was retained within the Israelites' home towns and allocated. Has the reader noticed that the offerings and tithes in Deut 12, 14, 15, 16 are with respect to the Festivals at the place that the LORD chooses to place His Name?

The Bible does NOT say

  1. that this tithe was ever in the form of money. Rather, it was produce that could be eaten (vv 12,14);
  2. that it was an additional or separate tithe. Instead, it was the normal "tithe of your produce in the third year" (v 12), the same full tithe for that year mentioned in Deut 14:28 .
THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: More from Genesis to Deuteronomy
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, (Vol 2; pp 702-703), makes some useful and summary comment at this point: IN "THE LAND"
The tithing laws were more regulated and more strictly observed in the land of Canaan as a central sanctuary-the tabernacle, and later the Temple-was established.

Tithing is expressed in terms of farming life in the land of Israel (Lev 27:30). Although the Jewish authorities later extended the tithe to areas east and north of Palestine where the populations were predominantly Jewish, and to Egypt, with its large Jewish settlements, all other areas were proscribed. We can contrast this with the half-shekel temple tax of Ex 30:11-16, which was sent to the temple treasury by Israelites no matter where they lived and which provided funding for the temple.

When they were dispersed widely in predominantly Gentile areas centuries later, the Israelites did not consider the produce of those Gentile lands to be tithable according to the traditions of interpreting the law. Tithes from heathen countries were considered "impure" and not suitable for use in supporting the temple service (See Judaism, Vol 2, p 71, by George Foot Moore, and Edersheim's The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, Vol 1, p 9).

PURPOSES OF THE TITHE: Crops and Firstlings
Ten percent of agricultural and animal production was set aside each year. The intent behind the sacrifices, offerings, and tithing law was that the whole of Israelite society should benefit.

First and foremost, it was for the purpose of keeping God's Feasts. The Levitical tithing laws given to ancient Israel did not, as some would have us believe, involve a three-tiered system of tithes. Such interpretation is based on rabbinic traditions and there are disagreements within these traditions.

The Pentateuch seems to refer to one tithe. The words "first," "second" and "third" in reference to tithes are not to be found in the Scriptures. The origins of these terms shall be examined further.

Each year, ten percent of agricultural and animal production was laid aside. Every first, second, fourth and fifth years of the seven-year sabbatical cycle, three times in the year at the three festival seasons (Deut 16:16-17), the tithe was brought to a central place. At first it was the tabernacle, then the temple. Numerous additional and meaningful offerings, also required by law, were brought in (Deut 12:6-7; 14:22-24). Here the tithe-payer would eat of the offerings and tithes with the Levites invited to share in the bounteous blessings (Deut 12:28-29; 26:12-13). Are we not told to live by every word of God (Deut 8:3; Lk 4:4)? What present festival-keeping efforts can each of us define that conform, in principle, to these biblical practices? The faithful need to discuss these matters and draw godly conclusions.

The question now arises: Were Levites officiating at the sanctuary during non-festival times of the year still entitled to a share of the Israelites' tithe? We should realize that the priests and the Levites were entitled to the peoples' offerings and to the gifts brought by all worshippers who came-at any time-to the sanctuary where they were serving. While it appears from the Scriptures that most of the populace made their offerings from their tithes during the three festival seasons, the Bible does not preclude offerings being brought for the Levites at non-festival times.

Ten percent was specified, as offerings of the tithes of produce, from the people, who then gave a tithe offering to the priests (Num 18:24,26). What is clear from the Scriptures, again contrary to the claims of many, is that the Levites could not make universal demands on the people for offerings and tithes. This is one reason, no doubt, why God told the Israelites to include the Levites in their festival activities when they were not officiating (Deut 12:12; 14:27,29). The "tithe-of-the-tithe" offering was made by the Levites to the Aaronic priests who were officiating at the sanctuary (Num 18:25-28).

NEHEMIAH'S TIME
After the captivity and the return of the Jews to Judah we see how Nehemiah seems to have made modifications to the manner in which the Levites' portion of the tithe was collected. Nehemiah, perhaps because of economic circumstances, reduced the amount of the temple tax from the half-shekel levied upon Israel by Moses for the tabernacle service (Ex 30:12-16) to one-third of a shekel (Neh 10:32,33). Nehemiah changed a law of Moses? He changed a law but not a principle.

Nine-tenths of the Jews lived in towns other than Jerusalem (Neh 11:1), including many of the priests and Levites who had their own property (Neh 11:3). Nehemiah had to ensure the prompt payment of tithes to provide for the immediate needs of the Levitical priests in the temple. We see from Mal 3:8-10 that he had good cause for concern for, just a short time later, the Jews were being derelict in their responsibility in bringing their tithes to the temple. He saw to it that all the peoples' vows (Neh 9:38; 10:28,29) would be fulfilled by appointing the Levites to receive the various offerings and tithes with an Aaronic priest supervising the receipt of these many gifts from the communities (10:32-39). Notice, again, that the tithes of the people were in kind (vv 35-37), as were their offerings.

An argument could be made that since there was a need to levy a temple tax on every male-both in Moses' day and in the time of Nehemiah-the tithe was not a ten percent tax upon the farming community and paid solely to support the Levitical priesthood and temple. It is difficult to be certain about how much this temple tax provided as income throughout Israel's history even up to Christ's day (Matt 17:24).

The NT scholar, F.F. Bruce, makes the following comment: "The Temple services were maintained chiefly by the capitation tax of one half-shekel payable annually on the first day of Adar (February-Marsh) by each male Jew of twenty years old and upward (fn: Cf. Ex 30:11-16; 2Chr 24:6; Josephus, Ant. XIV,210; Mishnah, Sheqalim). Jews from all parts of the world paid this tax, and its collection and conveyance to Jerusalem were facilitated by the Roman authorities. The coinage most accepted for this purpose was the silver tetradrachma of Tyre, equivalent in value to a shekel; two Jews normally combined to pay their contributions with this coin. This was the coin which, in the incident of Matt 17:24-7, Peter was instructed by Jesus to give to the collectors 'for me and for yourself'" (New Testament History, [Doubleday-Galilee:1980], pp 141-142).

THE LEVITES, THEIR WORK, OFFERINGS, AND TITHES
A greater number of the Levites did not perform services in the temple, probably because there was not enough work for everyone during non-festival times. In David's time, 24 courses or groups of priests served two one-week shifts each year at the temple. For the rest of the time, they lived in their home-towns (1Chr 24:1-19). All priests served during the festival seasons. This system was still in place in Christ's day (Lk 1:5-9), (Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus, [Fortress Press: 1981], p 199).

The Levites, probably more numerous than the Aaronic priests, served together on a rotational basis (1Chr 24 to 26; 28:13,21). Forty-eight cities had been allotted to them (Num 35:1-8), along with pasture lands and livestock to enable them to earn their living-just like any other citizen within the community of Israel-without depending solely on the offerings and tithes they were given. These Levitical cities were theirs in perpetuity (Lev 25:32-34). When the Bible says that the Levites "have no inheritance among the Israelites" (Num 18:24), it does not mean that they did not have homes, cities, and pasturage. They did not have the right to sell their own land, and did not have inheritance in large specific areas, as the other tribes had given to them (Josh 14 to 19). Cities of refuge and cities specifically for the Levites are defined in Josh 20-21. They were, of course, expected to trust in the Lord's provision through the people (Num 18:20-24). If they were zealous in teaching the word of the LORD, if they were zealous for justice and righteousness, and if they were inspiring in their godliness, then surely the people would respond in generous support (cp. Matt 6:21; Lk 18:18-30). God's pattern of application is that He asks us to do His Will, but He does not force us. God's Way is similarly expressed in all His Ways: individual and national. This pattern will be seen again as we consider the NT teaching in support of God's shepherds (1Cor 9:3-18).

If the priests have helped lead the hearts of the people to the true God, then surely where the hearts of the people are so would be gifts of their successes, the firstfruits of their accomplishments, sacrifices from their devotion, offerings from their works. Worshippers at the temple should support the temple. If the church of your fellowship is helping to change your life according to the Scriptures, and that is a reality, then you should support those who give godly care and nurture. If your heart, mind, motivations, speech and deeds are not being transformed according to the Word of God in your present environment, then why are you there?

The Levites performed numerous duties within the nation of Israel. Consider the following examples of some of their occupations:

When they were on duty at God's sanctuary they received not the whole of the Israelites' tithes-the full tenth-but that part of the tithe "offered as a heave offering" (Num 18:24), a portion of the total tithes (see Table 2). The rest of the tithes of the Israelites was eaten by them before God at the central sanctuary (Deut 14:22-27). Deut 14:27 tells us that "the Levites resident in your towns" (not at that time officiating at the sanctuary) shared in the tithes with the Israelite households, as opposed to being the automatic recipients of those offerings and tithes. These Levites performed numerous functions within the local community as well as officiating at the commanded assemblies held on sabbaths, new moons, and feast days (cp. Isa 66:23 and 1:13-14).

To illustrate more fully just how the Levites received a portion of the peoples' tithes, let us re- examine Num 18:25-32.

When the Levites received that part of the tithe considered their "portion" (v 26; also see Deut 12:5-7,11-12), they were to set apart from this, and from all the numerous offerings and sacrifices to which they were entitled (v 29; Deut 12:6-7), their own offering (Num 18:29)-the "tithe of the tithe" (v 26)-and gave it to the Aaronic priests (v 28). This was to be from the best part of the peoples' tithes (vv 29-30), just as all their offerings to God were to be from the very best of all they received. Once the Levites had made their offerings they could consume them, even away from the sanctuary.

Note v 27 in particular: the offerings of grain and wine the Levites gave to the priests from what they received from the Israelites were considered as though they had been produced by the Levites themselves.

The parallel is obvious. Just as the people gave a part of their tithes as an offering (heave offering: terumah, contribution), so the Levites gave a tenth of all they received from the Israelites, also as an (heave) offering. Num 18:31 in the NKJV has the footnote "wages" for "payment," i.e., specific wages for a specific job.

The Levites were to nourish and nurture the people on the Word of God. Whenever they failed, the result would inevitably lead to a famine of the Word. This would appear to have been most of the time as Stephen explained to the Sanhedrin in Acts 7:39-43. Admittedly, there were brief historic restorations.

Consider the following translation of Num 18:25-28 in the light of v 24, where the tithes of the Israelites, that part "which they have set apart as an offering to the Lord" is described:

In other words, out of the total of the peoples' tithes, there was, for each individual Israelite family, as well as for the Levites, from what they received from the people, a "contribution due to the Lord," "set apart," "out of all the tithes received" (v 28).

In one sense, therefore, the school of tradition that maintains that the so-called "Festival tithe" was taken out of nine-tenths of the tithe left after the so-called "Levitical tithe" had been paid does have a little merit, although a tenth is not designated in Num 18:24. If this were the case then the various offerings would have to be generous to provide for the Levites. Biblical history is clear that the system broke down frequently (e.g., Joash, c.835 BC, 2Chr 24:1-6; Hezekiah, c.714 BC, 2Chr 29:1-6; 30:25-27; Josiah, c.622 BC, 2Chr 34:9-11; 35:16-19;).

The tithes of the Israelites, once offerings had been made (Deut 16:17), were used to keep God's festivals. The tithe was still "holy" to God (Lev 27:30), in the sense that part of it went to the Levites at the sanctuary (God saw to it that they were provided for), and the rest used to serve and worship God at His holy convocations. What precludes giving extra offerings: thank offerings, vow offerings, freewill offerings, etc?

The Third and the Sixth Years
Deut 14:22-27 contains the legislation for the normal usage of the tithes of the people-to keep God's feasts. We have already noted how the Levites serving at the central sanctuary were entitled to a share of the peoples' tithes accumulated in the first, second, fourth and fifth years.

THE FIRST, SECOND, AND THIRD TITHES
Which Scriptures define first, second, third tithes? Footnotes in The Soncino Chumash, The Five Books of Moses with Haphtaroth, (Soncino Press: 1981), with the relevant Scriptures cited here say that

  1. first tithe is addressed in Gen 14:20; Ex 23:28; Num 18:31; Deut 14:29;
  2. second tithe is expressed in Lev 27:30; Deut 12:17-18; 14:23; 16:16;
  3. third tithe is revealed in Deut 14:28,29a; 26:12.
We shall note that there is cause for the existent controversy as to which Scriptures define which tithes and how these are determined.

Let's note Deut 14:28-29 again.
The people were told that every third and sixth year, once all the harvests were reaped, they were to use that year's offerings and tithes of the various crops and animals (not an additional tithe of the produce), and use them locally, within their own cities. The implication is that they were not obligated to make offerings from it to the Levites at the sanctuary that year.

In vv 28-29, some authorities recognize that the third tithe was in fact a triennial substitute for the second tithe. It is difficult to know exactly when these additional, "festal" or "sacred," and "poor" tithes became so interpreted. In the third, and again in the sixth year (in the seventh year, when the land was not cultivated, there would be no produce to tithe on), the Israelite would not take the tithes to the sanctuary, but would dispose of them in his home town.

Advocates of the "third tithe" today use Deut 14:28-29 to argue that an additional tithe is necessary to provide for the poor and destitute in the church. This supposed third tithe is claimed by them to have been solely a type of welfare tax to assist the less fortunate in ancient Israel. However, let us consider the following:

  1. Many authorities consider that a double, let alone a triple tithe imposed upon the farmers of ancient Israel would have been excessive.
  2. The Levites, who were included in this purported "third" tithe (v 29) would scarcely have qualified as welfare recipients unless they and the people became negligent in the Law. They had their own land which, unlike the land owned by the Israelites, could not be sold (Lev 25:34). Moreover, God demanded of the people that the Levites' needs be always attended to, whether as recipients of the tithe-offerings at the sanctuary (Num 18:21, 24, 26) or in sharing the benefits of the tithe with them at other times (Deut 12:12; 14:27, 29).
  3. The poor in Israel were provided for in other ways. Consider for instance:
    • Ex 22:25-27 (no interest on loans);
    • Lev 19:9-10 (the law of leaving gleanings); Ruth 2:2 (the poor work to gather the gleanings; law must allow this to happen).
    • Deut 15:7-11; 26:12-13 (generosity; compassion; sharing of blessings);
At feasts held locally, the needs of the poor were to be especially provided for. They would benefit from the additional bounty available because the Israelites of the city incurred no travelling expenses in not attending the feasts at the central sanctuary that year.

A festival atmosphere-rather than a purely social welfare one-is definitely implied by the directive that the disadvantaged classes were to come to eat their fill. This also implies a designated meeting-place for worship. Such community spirit provides the means for awareness of the needs within the community. What social welfare system, anywhere, is set up to ensure that the poor and disadvantaged eat their fill-have all that they need, and more? Rather Lev 19:9-10, 25:39-43, and Ruth 2:2 stress that the poor can "eat their fill," indicate that God expected the poor in ancient Israel to work to help provide for their needs. This principle of Biblical culture is expounded by the apostle Paul to the Church of God in Thessalonica (2Thess 3:6-13).

This culture of awareness of community needs was manifested in the very beginnings of the NT Church. Jerusalemites sold land and possessions to help sustain their brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ who had come from afar and whose means of support had run out because of their historic overextended stay (Acts 2:5-10,44-46; 4:32-37). Abuse of such trust and integrity was severely punished (Acts 5:1-11).

The reason that the Levites were included in the community re-allocation of the normal tithe in the third year is that even when not officiating at the central sanctuary, they were worthy of support by their fellow Israelites. They had many other functions and responsibilities within the community besides their duties at the tabernacle or temple. At times when the festivals were held locally they had increased duties and therefore warranted extra honour. Their inclusion (v 29) does not necessarily imply that they were impoverished or disadvantaged. They, in this third year, were simply to share more fully in the benefits of the community's tithe, as were the less fortunate.

When applied, Deut 14:28-29 creates a system, as we feel it does, where every three years the festivals are kept locally and the additional resources that became available are used for the needs of the less fortunate. The dogma that these verses refer only to a type of "God-ordained social welfare" system, unconnected with the festivals, cannot be sustained. What this re-allocation of the tithe in the third year shows us is further proof that there appears to have been a great deal of flexibility, community spirit, and awareness of needs within the offerings and tithing system in Israel. Are we not reminded of what Jesus Christ says characterizes His followers (Jn 13:34-35)? Today, with the disintegration of churches and the scattering of the brethren (See The Ministry in the Last Days), small and scattered groups would find it spiritually and socially advantageous to gather together for the festivals at a mutually-agreed location. Emphasis is on love among the brethren as seen in fellowshipping (Jn 13:34-35). Love and truth cannot be separated. Those who claim the love of God and fear truth are deceiving themselves.

Let us examine Deut 26:12-15, a parallel Scripture.
This act of placing special emphasis on the materially disadvantaged members of the community, as well as honouring the contribution of the Levite to Israelite society was (and is) especially meritorious in God's eyes. Spiritual, cultural, social, and emotional needs are provided by the love, discerning awareness, wisdom and generosities of those ministering within their spiritual community through God's calling and gifts. The safety net of the community also has much to generously give and wholeheartedly sacrifice for those in genuine need. The faithful individual Israelite would follow through on biblical instructions and see to it that offerings and tithes for that year had been given to individuals within the community (vv 12-13). At some time at the end of the third year, presumably before God at the central sanctuary (as v 13 seems to imply), the Israelite was to ask for special blessings, not for himself, but for the whole community of Israel (v 15; cp. Solomon's extraordinarily powerful dedicatory prayer at the temple [2Chr 6:18-41]). We should note the personal responsibility Scripture expects of everyone who loves God and His people (1Jn 4:7,11,17-21).

The Levites are mentioned as deserving consideration in all the Scriptures dealing with the so-called "first," "second," and "third" tithes. Consider:

If, as is claimed, the Levites were the exclusive recipients of a "first tithe," why do they have to be re-included in so-called "second" and "third" tithe Scriptures? One reason might be that they needed support for their attendance and work at the festivals. But it does seem extraordinary that Levites should ever fall into the category of being in material need (Deut 14:29; 26:12). One would think that in receiving shares in the all the numerous sacrifices, offerings, and tithes the Levites would not ever be in need (Deut 18:1-8; Num 18:8-32). It would seem, therefore, that God, just as He foresaw sin in Eden (1Pet 1:18-20; 2Tim 1:9), also foresaw negligence and dereliction in religious practice among both ministry and laity.

It might be argued that these references are proof that:

FIRSTBORN and FIRSTLINGS to the Levites and the Feasts?
It is worth noting that Num 18:8-24 includes firstborn (vv 15,17-18) as being given to the Levites. Deut 15:19-20 says that the firstborn animals are to be eaten at the place the LORD shall choose, i.e., at the festival site(s) during the festivals. Are there two sets of firstborn? Or is it one firstborn that is used in two different ways? The answer is self-evident. The Hebrew for firstborn, firstling, firstfruits, as used in the following Scriptures, is derived from bekor, or bikkurim, which is plural.

We read in:
Lev 27:26-27 The firstborn of the animals, which should be the Lord's firstborn, no man shall dedicate; whether it is an ox or sheep, it is the Lord's. 27 If it is an unclean animal, then he shall redeem it according to your valuation, and shall add one-fifth to it; or if it is not redeemed, then it shall be sold according to your valuation.

And we read in:
Num 18:15-18 Everything that first opens the womb of all flesh, which they bring to the LORD, whether man or beast, shall be yours (i.e., the Levites); nevertheless the firstborn of man you shall surely redeem (because this typifies the redemption of man by the blood of the Lamb of God), and the firstborn of unclean animals you shall redeem (cf. Lev 27:27). 16 And those redeemed of the devoted things you shall redeem when one month old, according to your valuation, for five shekels of silver (silver is symbolic of redemption; Ex 30:11-16; 38:25-26), according to the shekel of the sanctuary, which is twenty gerahs. 17 But the firstborn of a cow, the firstborn of a sheep, or the firstborn of a goat you shall not redeem; they are holy. You shall sprinkle their blood on the altar, and burn their fat as an offering made by fire for a sweet aroma to the LORD. 18 And their flesh shall be yours (i.e., the Levitical priests), just as the wave breast and the right thigh are yours (cp. Deut 12:6-7).

So here we see the Levites sacrificing the firstborn of animals and then eating their flesh. However, the following references show that those who owned the animals ate them and shared them with the Levites.

Since there can be only one set of firstborn from a farmer's cattle, sheep, and goats, firstborn can only be given once. The Levites sacrifice and eat them with the owners at the sanctuary, or in the home town of the animal's owner. It seems that Deut 14:22-29 is not talking about more than one tithe. It is consistent in describing how the offerings and tithes of produce and animals were to be used to celebrate the festivals within the seven-year system in ancient Israel. In these verses is the Law's summation dealing with the use of the tithe (and offerings are implicit) as it affects:
  1. the individual Israelite (v 22: year by year);
  2. his religious observance within the nation at the central sanctuary (v 24: if the place where the LORD your God chooses to put His Name is too far from you);
  3. his religious observance within his local community (v 27: You shall not forsake the Levite within your gates); and
  4. his neighbourly responsibility to share with the needy (v 29: the stranger and the fatherless and widow who are within your gates).
THE LEVITICAL SYSTEM: Other Considerations
The Levitical tithing laws were given to a specific nation, for specific purposes. The tithe, as we have noted, was not a tithe of one's total income, rather a tithe of the produce and animals (but offerings were and are on the basis of one's total income). Some examples of benefit to the serving Levites are found in: Lev 12:6; 14:19-32; Deut 16:10-17). The tithe was a portion of the Levites' sustenance and their entitlement for service at the sanctuary. Israel's tithing laws were tailored to suit the needs of the nation (Heb 7:12,18-19,23-24; 8:1-6). These conditions are not extant today: The tithe, distributed differently over a seven-year recurring cycle within the Jubilee cycle, was not simply intended for religious purposes. The responsibilities of the Levites extended beyond ministering at the sanctuary, and their inclusion in the distribution of the people's tithes at other times can be likened to the manner in which our taxes support our educational institutions, hospitals, courts and law enforcement agencies, cultural bodies, the arts, public buildings, and the like. A paper covering the subject of the seven-year cycles and the 50-year jubilee cycles will be forthcoming.

The tithe was not a levy on one's total income used for religious purposes. Consider the following in this context:

When righteous leaders rule the people rejoice, but when those who are wicked in God's eyes rule as Gentile benefactors, the people groan (Prov 29:2; Ps 107:40-43; Lk 22:25).